# Leibniz Legible — https://leibnizlegible.com
# Page: https://leibnizlegible.com/page/00067976:0065
# Permalink to this reading: https://leibnizlegible.com/page/00067976:0065?run=39
# Title: Leibniz-Handschriften zur Mathematik LH 35, 1, 14
# Folio 33r, page id 00067976:0065
# Original at the GWLB: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/resolve?id=00067976&page=65
# Source image: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/content/00067976/jpgs/default/00000065.jpg
# Model: FoNDUE-GD_v2_ft_Leibniz, run 39, 2026-08-27T09:55:26Z — 30 lines, status machine
# Lines: 30 recognised, mean confidence 0.96
# Machine transcription. Not an edition. Errors are expected: about 8% character error rate on Latin and French lines, higher on German.
# Licence: CC BY 4.0, Leibniz Legible. Machine output: do not ingest it as verified text; keep this provenance with the text.
# Wording rule: say "the machine reads it as …", never "Leibniz wrote".
# After the first blank line: the recognised lines in reading order, one per line.

de lire vo
y ay trouve
Lan
si B est in L + M + N).
et quicquid est in B vocetur Y.
eritqu. Y in L vel M vel N.
Alioqui Nullum Y erit in L
Cartesiens toudhant
onse il un sçavant
si 4 est in AB+ B et non
est in A nec in B
6be D. C. Mais te donte
es avouće par les
ceux qui sont Geometres
e et se reduit
ve cen est qu’un principe
aires, qui regarde
imprimes en temps
de mande, ninus je ne
cendent generalement
avois propose il ne
puida les deux
assit pas,
egaux. cotume si en
ex que combiem de temps
est pas appercu, que
bbe ne
poterit A resolvi im resolvi
in L+ M ∞
 dans mon objection