# Leibniz Legible — https://leibnizlegible.com
# Page: https://leibnizlegible.com/page/00068051:0077
# Permalink to this reading: https://leibnizlegible.com/page/00068051:0077?run=73
# Title: Leibniz-Handschriften zur Mathematik LH 35, 6, 6
# Folio 39r, page id 00068051:0077
# Original at the GWLB: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/resolve?id=00068051&page=77
# Source image: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/content/00068051/jpgs/default/00000077.jpg
# Model: FoNDUE-GD_v2_ft_Leibniz, run 73, 2026-08-27T15:28:38Z — 53 lines, status machine
# Lines: 53 recognised, mean confidence 0.76
# Machine transcription. Not an edition. Errors are expected: about 8% character error rate on Latin and French lines, higher on German.
# Licence: CC BY 4.0, Leibniz Legible. Machine output: do not ingest it as verified text; keep this provenance with the text.
# Wording rule: say "the machine reads it as …", never "Leibniz wrote".
# After the first blank line: the recognised lines in reading order, one per line.

1d (1)
= ve + Vf+9 sit cd, V, P, pendens ex a
valabili pro curvis ordinatim concurrentibus
oeet e, f, variantes ex x y. fiet. vamand
isferutio secundum a,
7
cd (2)
deo C = dv e + dV f
ex 1 et 2. fit acd ve + dco If dv C + dIBf
qu. 1.
Atcog
urandi secundum X et Y, fiet ex aequ. 1. fiet
4
Edeet Vde + 1df + d9 =0  ex Exdicari
s
l
 v 1b aes unam eandemue citeram, utemn
sC
avetur ejus valor. oe variabilem a, adhibila
stante C evanescet da inaege. 3. et sit
duulor ipsius a, quem et tolla, ex ag. 4 et
fiat aeq. in quae ce supererunt e, t, g quas
esicet explicare per duas X et y. quim
et licuisset D, et et 1B explicare per
X y ja, c. ea lege, at sola a sit variabilis
differentiis eami investigandis et exeq
proaeg. 3 scriberetue neo De+dcoDf, daog2
de + edo + 1V + fdip idg Con   per
a sexplicando  per X, y, a, c. sed F
solum a). Et priaeq. A fieret vde+ + id
sed suffecerit sic procedi
)
Cd
C  15 +9-
 P+H + f, ubi c et V, et a expli-
icando per a, b; et F per X, y; et m per a, x, gC
subi su ipsius in diffia secundum a sit cam semnim
ely sit cdm am. Ergo disferentiando
n
lenum a, fit deo ( P + m+ f = dP + (d) m
fiffereuande dum Xey, sit am + dF =0 et explicando
(0, , per a, C, et  per X, yC, et m per a, X, yC.
oclatur a ope aeqq. 2 et 3. (ham connescit da) habe
titur aeq. 4 in qua X y C dx dus quae est differentipe
per aeq. resolubilis. Notu co et Y per a et c possunt
badi irrationalifer nemp co:a perta: c
pese resio
t
c
t
e
in
e