# Leibniz Legible — https://leibnizlegible.com
# Page: https://leibnizlegible.com/page/00068130:0003
# Permalink to this reading: https://leibnizlegible.com/page/00068130:0003?run=73
# Title: Leibniz-Handschriften zur Mathematik LH 35, 9, 6
# Folio 2r, page id 00068130:0003
# Original at the GWLB: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/resolve?id=00068130&page=3
# Source image: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/content/00068130/jpgs/default/00000003.jpg
# Model: FoNDUE-GD_v2_ft_Leibniz, run 73, 2026-08-27T15:28:38Z — 24 lines, status machine
# Lines: 24 recognised, mean confidence 0.93
# Machine transcription. Not an edition. Errors are expected: about 8% character error rate on Latin and French lines, higher on German.
# Licence: CC BY 4.0, Leibniz Legible. Machine output: do not ingest it as verified text; keep this provenance with the text.
# Wording rule: say "the machine reads it as …", never "Leibniz wrote".
# After the first blank line: the recognised lines in reading order, one per line.

Ex quo Mediasma de Medii Resistentia publicavi in Actis
mensis
Februarii 1089. venere in manus meas quae Viri in Mathematica
+
naturae cognitione praecellentissimi Hugenius et Neutonus novissimis
operibus de eodem argumento dixere. Animadverti autem eos respectivam
tantum quam voco, Resistentiam attigisse, quanem nempesentit corpus in liquido
tenacitate notabili carente, velut in aere; non vero absolutam, quae oritum
a tenacitate medii aut asperitate superficiei contactus, inter quas multum interesse
jam ostendi, cum respectiva respectum habeat ad celeritatem mobilis, eaque aucta
crescat, absoluta non item. Circa respectivam video nos isdem funda
mentis inaedificasse etsi prima fronte aliud videri possit, ipsi enim statuunt
Resistentias esse in duplicata ratione velocitatum, subintelligendo nimirum
alementa temporis sumi aequalia, ego vero resistentias esse dixi in ratione
Composita velocitatum et elementorum spati, ne quid scilicet in enentiatione
esset subinte llegendum. Unde jam resitentis temporis sumtis aequalibu quo
Casu elementa spatii velocitatibus proportionalia sunt) utique resissentia erunt
in duplicata ratione velocitatum quod etiam pannotavimus artic. E. prop. 3.
in conclasionibus autem deducendis proestitialiquid in fallor, quod ipsorum traditis
non continetur explicata scilicet tratione iptam construendi lineatm projectionis
or bie
artic. 6. prop. 1.
et quadratura Hyperbolae
Conclusio autem quae apud utrumque extat