# Leibniz Legible — https://leibnizlegible.com # Page: https://leibnizlegible.com/page/00068165:0094 # Permalink to this reading: https://leibnizlegible.com/page/00068165:0094?run=74 # Title: Leibniz-Handschriften zur Mathematik LH 35, 10, 12 # Folio 47v, page id 00068165:0094 # Scan: One image of two folio pages side by side, registered by the library under both labels (also fol. 48r); this page is its left half. # Original at the GWLB: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/resolve?id=00068165&page=94 # Source image: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/content/00068165/jpgs/default/00000094.jpg # Model: FoNDUE-GD_v2_ft_Leibniz, run 74, 2026-09-06T16:05:13Z — 65 lines, status machine # Lines: 65 recognised, mean confidence 0.94 # Machine transcription. Not an edition. Errors are expected: about 8% character error rate on Latin and French lines, higher on German. # Licence: CC BY 4.0, Leibniz Legible. Machine output: do not ingest it as verified text; keep this provenance with the text. # Wording rule: say "the machine reads it as …", never "Leibniz wrote". # After the first blank line: the recognised lines in reading order, one per line. patet haec corpora vim habere rursus eo reassurgendi B et siquidem singula corpora unius libs aeponantur B vim habere attollendi libram ad pedes 36, C ad pes 1 amborum simul vim esse attollendi libram ad pedes 5282 post concursum vero secundum Cartesium ambo habebunt celericatem ut 5, ergo habebunt vim assurgendi usque ad H D cujus altitudo perpendicularis sit pedum 25. et pote proinde poterunt attollere duas libras ad pedes 25, seu unam libram ad pedes 50. Ergo jam veri ante libram poterant concursum poterant atollere libram ad pedes 82 ergo perit vis attollendi libram ad pedes 32, et quidem periit sine ulla causa aut translatione, quod est absurdum stare igitur regula non potest. Doctissimus Doctissius autor libri de inquirenda autor libri pdecle veritate quaedam Cartesiana recte correxit + quod refutamus deceptus tamen principius Cartes iani specielitate regulae sextae Cartesianae in eundem scopulum impegit. Nempe in c casu nostro casu pest ictum casu quartae regulae fartesianae a cartesio, si ponatur corpus majus librae 1. B B librae i sincusere celerititi ut 10 qurescens C celeritate corpus duplum ubi di e adest potentia attendi libram ad itidem librae 1. aeritate ut 10, eit aderit vis attallendi libram ad pedes 100, si placet 2 in currere quiescens C libiarum C’qu motus vero quantitus erit ut 10. post ictum concursum bo secundum autorem unc) incurrenet celeritat in corpus ambo simul ibunt celeritate ut 5, adeoque corpora 2 in moles 2 in celeritatem 5 dabit iterum 10, servabitur ergo quantitas motus. At vero quantitas virium minime servatur nam cum b cum ambo corpora assuru ere simul possint ad redes 25, poterunt una libra duas libras attollere ad pedes 25 seu unum ad pedes 50. cum tamen uncte ante concursum adesset vis attollendi unam libram ad pedes 100 steriit ergo dimidia potentiae quantitas, et quidem sine causa, quod defendi non potest. Eademque caeteras quoque regulas Atque Habemusque eadem opera Methodum caeteras methodo, ooq regulas examinandi, quod brevitatis causa praetermitio. Eadem autem qu Ex his facile patet Methodus caeteras quoque o regulas ad hoc novum principium, nt a me propositum certissimumue qud endem in communicatione motuum eadem Remper quantias vitiunt rv examinandi sane uni ersalissimum summa, examinandi, quod nempe eadem sempet virium tetu q servetur; q virium inquam quae nempe eundem semper effectum producere possint. quod igitur experimentis, nsa quae nempe eundem semper effectum produaee glossit