# Leibniz Legible — https://leibnizlegible.com
# Page: https://leibnizlegible.com/page/00068193:0429
# Permalink to this reading: https://leibnizlegible.com/page/00068193:0429?run=74
# Title: Leibniz-Handschriften zur Mathematik LH 35, 11, 18C
# Folio 212r, page id 00068193:0429
# Original at the GWLB: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/resolve?id=00068193&page=429
# Source image: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/content/00068193/jpgs/default/00000429.jpg
# Model: FoNDUE-GD_v2_ft_Leibniz, run 74, 2026-09-06T16:05:13Z — 58 lines, status machine
# Lines: 58 recognised, mean confidence 0.84
# Machine transcription. Not an edition. Errors are expected: about 8% character error rate on Latin and French lines, higher on German.
# Licence: CC BY 4.0, Leibniz Legible. Machine output: do not ingest it as verified text; keep this provenance with the text.
# Wording rule: say "the machine reads it as …", never "Leibniz wrote".
# After the first blank line: the recognised lines in reading order, one per line.

nunt
De Concureu Corporum.
Nam (ex prop. 17.) omnes motus sunt rectiliner unifor-
mes inter se compositi. Sed si corporum firmitas aliunde
quam a motuum compositione est, gyratio quoque aliunde quam
N.1
a compositione nascitur, ex ipa scilicit necessitate quae se-
quirur ea hypothesi firmitatis. Utique enim (fiu. ) rectan
corpoream seu crassitudine praeditam ac firmam LM,
in extrimitatibus L et M aequali vi respectiva motuum
contrariorum AL, BM, a corporibus A et B simul put
11
progredientibus corporibus.
satam, in gyrum agi necesse est circa punctum medium
N, sed ita materia circa L vel M a centro N recedere
O
tentans sola firmitate corporis non motu contrario im
presso retinctur; nec proinde motus circularis iste con
sirtit in compositione rectilineorum; nisi iptam firmi-
tatem motu quodam appresionis explicemus. Idem
conficitur ed prop. 19; quam non tantum ex prop. 17.
sed et alia diversa ratione demonstravimus, unte rursus
prop. 17. ex prop. 19. una cum praesente 20. regressu quo
dam aliter quam supra demonstratur. Nimirum quia
in prop. 29. ostensum ett, ob naturam motus respectivum
hypothetet etse indiscernibiles, etiam cognosci non debet,
utrum corpus aliquod gyretur; sed posito firmitatum
atqe adeo gyrationes ea motuum rectilineorum compo-
sitione non nasei, motum absolutum a quiete discernendi
ratio datur. Sit enim (fius.) corpus ACB gyrans
circa suum centrum C, juxta seriem punctorum ADB,
et jam ponatur firmitatem conporis divolvi, partemque ex
remam ut A rupto vinculo separari, ibit linca reita
vensus
ibil
scere
ita
3
ol
se
Quo
Mo
tet
MM
et
esse
aesse
m
Ron
nta
cum
ia
tien
emus
epre
fyr
I
Nam