# Leibniz Legible — https://leibnizlegible.com
# Page: https://leibnizlegible.com/page/00068194:0484
# Permalink to this reading: https://leibnizlegible.com/page/00068194:0484?run=74
# Title: Leibniz-Handschriften zur Mathematik LH 35, 12, 1
# Folio 242v, page id 00068194:0484
# Original at the GWLB: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/resolve?id=00068194&page=484
# Source image: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/content/00068194/jpgs/default/00000484.jpg
# Model: FoNDUE-GD_v2_ft_Leibniz, run 74, 2026-09-06T16:05:13Z — 30 lines, status machine
# Lines: 30 recognised, mean confidence 0.92
# Machine transcription. Not an edition. Errors are expected: about 8% character error rate on Latin and French lines, higher on German.
# Licence: CC BY 4.0, Leibniz Legible. Machine output: do not ingest it as verified text; keep this provenance with the text.
# Wording rule: say "the machine reads it as …", never "Leibniz wrote".
# After the first blank line: the recognised lines in reading order, one per line.

simum a nisi et hoc exaltanda videbitur
ad  a) componemus inter se debet
prodire aequatio quae ex et prodit ex
data X.: explicata et similiter per
arbitrariam exaltata forte tamen
ali quando brevior methodu verbi
quartus,
gratia videndum an non tebius gradys seu
X perY a+ b solvi possit hoc moda ut
aequatio ad _  eexaltata , vel
a’exaltata sorvi possit per a ta ta-
et A b + l b + Mb = _0 seu subsplis
omnibus Terminis aliis et deinde divelendo
in dubs. Ita enim licet duo sut lterae
tamen tantum tamen plures conservantur
term famae seu termini nempe conseruntur
termini a et a et a et a et
condnc methodus videtur simplicar puore
 sufficiant
et in oibus casibus procede arbitrariae. quod
a et th pere abx n fit x
examinemus a habeat formas f
et a formus
habemus terminos tollendas f- 4,  et arbitrarias, 
ergo deberet esse f-4= g. seu f
= 4 quo
absurdum est. jmngi ergo debet prist methodus. Ejus onim
ope ostenditur necesse non esse ut in altioribus teflantur
omnes termini; sed posse eos relinqui qui ex a- H
 oim