# Leibniz Legible — https://leibnizlegible.com # Page: https://leibnizlegible.com/page/00068196:0011 # Permalink to this reading: https://leibnizlegible.com/page/00068196:0011?run=74 # Title: Leibniz-Handschriften zur Mathematik LH 35, 13, 1 # Folio 6r, page id 00068196:0011 # Scan: One image of two folio pages side by side, registered by the library under both labels (also fol. 4v); this page is its right half. # Original at the GWLB: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/resolve?id=00068196&page=11 # Source image: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/content/00068196/jpgs/default/00000011.jpg # Model: FoNDUE-GD_v2_ft_Leibniz, run 74, 2026-09-06T16:05:13Z — 82 lines, status machine # Lines: 82 recognised, mean confidence 0.86 # Machine transcription. Not an edition. Errors are expected: about 8% character error rate on Latin and French lines, higher on German. # Licence: CC BY 4.0, Leibniz Legible. Machine output: do not ingest it as verified text; keep this provenance with the text. # Wording rule: say "the machine reads it as …", never "Leibniz wrote". # After the first blank line: the recognised lines in reading order, one per line. ubi signo diffirunt duo membra, quae unum habent factore commutm, seu notam posteriorem eodem loco. Et quodem omnes pro formandis membris adsunt combination ba tantum lege semata, ut in quovis membro reperiatur quaevis ut quodvis membrum sit trificum ( seu brium factorum) et in quovis membro quaevis nota tam prior quam posterior orepeniatur. porro harum quantitatum numeris fictitiis bi-notalibus designatarum, quaevis quan multiplicatur per 1 habens notum posteriorem I, multiplicatur per 100 et quia in quovis membro est una habens notam posteriorem 1, ideo omnia membra explicata dividentur per 100, et 100, quia non nisa semel est in quovis membro evanescet, eodem modo evanescent hic 290, et 300 sed hoc praevideri poterat, nam adhibuimus solum 100, 200, 300, ut ipleui ubique eadem esset maltitudo numerorum fictitiorum ideo eoanescunt cum p, q.V +10. 2132 = (1 +12 31232 LV2. 112. 113. 112. 123. 212, 217, 223.323 +112. 1237212, +112. 1231313, 4212. 232123 312.323 (- 112. 113. 123 212. 22. 22. 213,223, 323 +212. 2237113, +112. 1137323- 7 112. 12. 113133 9 -31. 323 212. 213 112. 223 ) 2312. 313 10.2231 = Sed quia is calculus prolixior, et videmur abundare arbitruriis, ptupideo pro contrahenda aequatione 14 8112. 10∞ p. - 312.380) 10Or = 1L = 31 100p 312 113 123,100p = 323. 3001 1e0p 33 nam fit ponatur 113. 123= 313. 323. Et procontiahenda aequatione 16 ponatur 112. 113 = 312. 313. et fiet 312: 112 = 113:313 =323: 123. Unde ex aequ. 14 fit 300r: 300p = 313. 13 et ex aqu. 18 similiter fiet 300r: 100p = 31X0113. Itaque hae duae aequatiores 1g et 18 hac duplici suppositu ad unam. Revera ergo non nis unam hypothesui consumlimus. Superestae quatio 10seri qua pro 300r substituamus (213: 112) 100p, et pro 312substituamus (13, 313) 112 et pro 323 substituamus (113: 313)123 itaque ex aequ. 20 fiet (multiplicatis omnibues per 113. 315) fiet +113 33 2t. 232 uL 100p + 1 aIZ 32 2 uE. 100. -112. H13. H3 123 1(3N212. 223.3132112 1p -112. (113 13. 1 23C Fil2. 223 1sL. 13. 13, 1 f113. 100p 13B. 222 tur 127 313313 Z(I ZEt 2009 113. 113.l13, 123 sed resumamus securioris calculi causa es ex aq. 30 faciamus + 1. 193. 313 3( 0op = . in n G e 213. 209 seu multiplicatis omnibus per 13. 313. 313 112. 1232 313,. 313, 313.313.100p FHIX 123. 313. B132 113. 213. 2009 +212. 223. 313.3132113. 113 100p + 2. 113. 113. 123 yihi Zt =112. 113. 113. 123. quae aequatio dividi non potest, nisi coefficiens ipsius dividipossit per ipsum autem ee s coefficiens est, 313. 3e3 (113H,. 212. 223 ta sed hoc video non litidefier si esset jam H3 H) 2(3. 33. sera divisis opni omnibus per 13. 113. 113. 3 fiere +2 +AAS oOp =1Z) 2. 209 adeoque 123 = H~. Ergo 312~323 Et quia 13 H3 = 313. 313 fiet etiam H12H2 = 312. 3R et 123. KG= 323.323 ItL 13 H2 123 itaque conjungendo valores ex rgo primum et itium ipsius ak, ex aequationibus V et 12 fiet 100 100 pp - ab 700 g0 rr-ad. et pro 300300rr substituendo valorem fieret 100, roopp - ab = (313. 313 : 117 1) 10. 10pP = ad, id est 1 roOpp- ab - 100. 10 pp - ac quod non licet. Ergo non licet contrahere aequationem C faciendo H3. 113 = 313. 313 +212. 223. 113. 113 +112. 123. 113. 113) 100( = (1. (20 +113. 1137112. 113. 123,213,2009 -113. 113 ium aequatiop duccedit ine ieq a nova determinatione, recimus. seu aequatio = 212-223. 113.113 112. 123. 113. 113 dividi potest per 4 213. 313 = 113 113. Veum non licet facera 313. 313 =113. 113. nam fiere neque adeo ponendo 113. I13 = 3(3. 313, quicquam proarbitrio etiam 112 112 = 312. 312, et 113. 123 = 32 3. 323. Unde conferendo duos valores ipsius ak, primum etterti ex 2gg. 10t Z, fieret 1 100pp - ab = 300. 300rr -ad. sed posito 113113 = 313. 313 fit 100.10pp = 300. 300rY ergofiecet ab ab quod o non licet. Itaque aequatio O dividenda est per 313.313 - 113. 113, et fiet EIL ECG. 313.313 (313.313-113. 113) +112. 123 (31373+11313) (313313 113 13 3100p = 112. 123. 113. 213. 2009 (313.513- 113. 113) actoque aquationem C dividendo per 313. 313- 113. 1 fiet 112. 123 (113. 113 +313. 313)=212. 23. 313.313,: 112. 113, 123. 212 -,2009: 100p ubisi faceremus 112. 124 = 212 (23 fieret 113. 43 = 2009: 100p. ita revera hactenus duo tantum pro bitrio assumsimus 2133(313313- 113. 43)