# Leibniz Legible — https://leibnizlegible.com # Page: https://leibnizlegible.com/page/00068201:0470 # Permalink to this reading: https://leibnizlegible.com/page/00068201:0470?run=74 # Title: Leibniz-Handschriften zur Mathematik LH 35, 14, 1 # Folio 235v, page id 00068201:0470 # Scan: One image of two folio pages side by side, registered by the library under both labels (also fol. 236r); this page is its left half. # Original at the GWLB: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/resolve?id=00068201&page=470 # Source image: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/content/00068201/jpgs/default/00000470.jpg # Model: FoNDUE-GD_v2_ft_Leibniz, run 74, 2026-09-06T16:05:13Z — 83 lines, status machine # Lines: 83 recognised, mean confidence 0.76 # Machine transcription. Not an edition. Errors are expected: about 8% character error rate on Latin and French lines, higher on German. # Licence: CC BY 4.0, Leibniz Legible. Machine output: do not ingest it as verified text; keep this provenance with the text. # Wording rule: say "the machine reads it as …", never "Leibniz wrote". # After the first blank line: the recognised lines in reading order, one per line. + + cX3 + dX + CX H - b .. _be. = bd - be Ponanus b. esse irrationalem quadraticam. Productam aequationem esse detere rationalem, Erit ergo be rationalis. Ergo quia b irrationalis quadratica, erit et e irrationalis quadratica. Aliequin enim ex irationali in rationalem fieret irrationalis quod foret absundum. Sit jam b irrationalis sumplex id est cujus quadhatum rationale quo posito necessario et C erit Arationalis, quoniam -V + C. dibet esse quantitas rationalis. Ergo bc est quantitas irrationalis, et et quia bc + d est quantitas rationalis, ideo d debet esse quantitas irrationalis. Habemus ergo unam rationalem c, tres irrationales b. d. . Debet autem be esse rationalis, quod ita reproesentabimus. b β + O+V et e dB - sB). Factum enin extris duabus esst rationale et cntinet haec formula omnes casus, quibus duaequantitates quae binomium non excedunt, i se ductae sunt rationales. Potest enim et, ( pini p0. qui est casus simplicissimus Sed Supersunt duae adrus Sed si β3. est quantitas realis tunc C non erit rationalis, nisi certis casibus cum sciliiet Iad simpliem irrationalem reduci potest. Itaque nondum quicquam determinavimus de quantitate C. Retineamus interim d, et e unde necessario quales praescripsimus. et erit - bp β - 2β6 5γ. quid si penamus C⊓ 2β8+) + ut sclicet - b4 c sit - D27 et quia -bc +d rationalis. et -bc p -+ a = .D sV, + d C. debet esse rationalis, euta recessano, de 2. = 2βDγ = AB.. Unaae jam superest implenda conditio e - bd quantitas rationalis, id est Psd autem eb d p 8β - 56s) - bdp a2 β 6 1Y = e β Sive s +22y =BAB.. et.. 2β3 - βA - . =XO2. +2βd19 + A B.. et est dβ- sB 1V, et debet esse esse - 107 - B B - n _ B - d B p0 quo facto habelimus obtentum, et fiet: +B X3 + X2 + 2B B1V X + HY +0 sy. er 1D.. d. 234 177 X + bX + x - dX +C X a01 17 + 2. + 2D.. 361V. = AdB..1 a (2 P2y. 2B27 g 310 2362) bi + n +e obhmn ubi artitrariae sunt, (.V. D. A. B. sed O. est inutilis, ett sumi potest pro unitate. unde restant aibitrarica numem 4. (3. 2. )M ex quibus sola omnium β3 ad altioaem solit omnes praeter β. ad nullam oscenditus pote tater Venea + 3bc i +6Vcn + C 3be2 1291 AB V Sit jam BB b m AC Y dnt t en +5 A Bgm +h l n vn .Z aBcn +ve n annm suum 6mumt 4mun + 4bct +C ina Arbatrariae sunt 10. b. crd. e. f. 9. h. l. v. Z.. at aequationibus subsidiatis opus fore hnlus, 2. 5. 4. 4. sp. 13. nihil ergo confert haec methodus. se