# Leibniz Legible — https://leibnizlegible.com
# Page: https://leibnizlegible.com/page/00068208:0058
# Permalink to this reading: https://leibnizlegible.com/page/00068208:0058?run=74
# Title: Leibniz-Handschriften zur Mathematik LH 35, 15, 6
# Folio 29v, page id 00068208:0058
# Scan: One image of two folio pages side by side, registered by the library under both labels (also fol. 28r); this page is its left half.
# Original at the GWLB: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/resolve?id=00068208&page=58
# Source image: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/content/00068208/jpgs/default/00000058.jpg
# Model: FoNDUE-GD_v2_ft_Leibniz, run 74, 2026-09-06T16:05:13Z — 92 lines, status machine
# Lines: 92 recognised, mean confidence 0.88
# Machine transcription. Not an edition. Errors are expected: about 8% character error rate on Latin and French lines, higher on German.
# Licence: CC BY 4.0, Leibniz Legible. Machine output: do not ingest it as verified text; keep this provenance with the text.
# Wording rule: say "the machine reads it as …", never "Leibniz wrote".
# After the first blank line: the recognised lines in reading order, one per line.

 quod si (eas vis materiae juon sit essentialis manfeste consequitur nungur
aliudtnus steri
eidem superventuram fuisse nisi incorporeat ervina totentia ei impressam atque infusem
p. 255. se frima haoo demonstrefur ejusmodi vim gravcutatis revera existere atue in praeu
ulis sastemalis constitutione perpetuo se exerene eare, utique novum et invectu pro asserendum
numnis existentia argumento nobis suppedilibit
onnor autor Evangel. Med. art. 14. p. 170. putat posse arcanum quendam
modum ait esse efficiendi ut idem corpus, non tamen endem persona sit simul in locis diversis
EItaque cum Lockius in tentamins BAC intellectu lib. 4. C. 18. sect. 5. dixisset: in propositionibus
quarum certitudo in aedificata est claris et perfectus ideis et evidentibus consequentis, nullam
propositionem pro divinbus revelata haberi posse quae illis contradicat, uede atque
Finde conclusissat idem corpus non posse esse in plundas locis
Trat in propositions W hose
certalatus is bailt on clearand perfect ideas, aud evident deductions of reason, there no proposi
e
tion can be received for divine revelation wich contradictsthem, crom lence non concludei M. Lock
Cncludes it impossible fore the same bodus to be in tuvo places at once (g. Mone e
stillinus fleetius in responsione ad secundam Lockii Epistolam p. 61.  relatis h N
Locsdi verbis subjicit. Aad  yet there is a person Woho hata lately told te oorid
that there is one scaret certain secret oay hou by divine pouver thesame body but not the
e same person may be. in very distant places. bat hre is avised to Kees it un as a secret
e
ubi subjicit stillensflectus irridens: vich ivas quod friendhus advice.
 Stilliagfleet p. 93. secundae responsionis a 40chiodatae. Aristotieo
Said thiis (naturam esse substantiam vel substantiam esse naturam) because hetoot Nature for
facha Such a substance as had the podoer of motion in it sel. I do not denus but ne
look d on that as the proper acception os nature; but froin hence it follouos, fhat Wohateve
substance hud suct a principle of motion in it self, oas trutus aud propertus nature, nos
as exclusive of d superiour principle of motion, but cis havinus an internal, self. movinus
Nempe paulo ante dixerat p. 91. Aristotle did not matze motion to arise from
matter but asserfed it to come trom a first mover and said, that those philosopher taked
likre men not, well in their coits iono atribuped motionta matter of it self, as i conto
principe
a selus prove efit coare necdful 7 pergit p. 98, itom i confesse Aristotle Was of
another apinu Aud herein Aristordis Aristotle differed from some moderu philosopher
roho matje all nution to come fiom the impulse of anoher body, aud to be a meermode
if matter continud fron one bodus to another; 1 consess Aristorle roas of another opinia
from thole, Gentlemen, aud looz on motion as an effect of an intoaed plinciple, aud
not meerlus ot au external impulse: but Wohether Aristotle rvere mistasqe en pereiu
Itaque Autor ait Aristotelem.
regn negam metianem quiri ex teria, sed a non de duaere motionem Coriginarie sex materia sed
is not the question, aud it is possible he das not
Ex primo imotore, eundem tame dare substantia corpores principium motus intemum, scilicet
c
a
lani ab autore rerum id ipsi inditum ot additque fortasse eum in hac re non falli. Et
p, 94. He tanes nature for suck a substance rohichhat the principles of motion aud
Within it s self aud bius it self, notrick he opposes toartificiul things, as a Bed or a Garment
sd as mach as this definition hate been run docon by somemen; is Wde set aside some
Rected obscuritus in his philosophical Voritinue, there is no such absurditus in it; oheus re explains
mox
rest
not folumerstand it of meer locel in otion or change ot place but of all alteration inci–
tobodies; A that nature in his sense roas a substane endued viti a principle
juvenis olim oiti diss. scripsi quam spizelius bro Epistolae ad Reiserum suae deAtheismo
Live aud action
Jon
posse explicari, nisi
Deum. Et at Lockias Tent. ae de intellectu lib. 2
adjecit, qua ostendere conatus sum ex connexionem partium materies
25. Woherein conssts the union and cohesion of paras seems to me as incompre
asthe manner ofthinkinus, aud hoco it is per formed. Et  c. 23.sect. 31 thatthe notibu
nisi recurratur ad
et bodus is cumbred Wwith some difficultres vichlare verr hari aud perhaps impossible to be explac
te
eckius rda cesi. ad stingit Stillinus leetio data. p. 395. G
extended solide
estance ith
. 404 Gravitatioa of matter docvards matter, aud in the sexeral proportions obse rable inevi–
rscieial is a solided extendes substance, uund autoise,
antess we lan conceveself. motion in matter, ox an
Nis true  say (Essay D00k2. ch. 8. 5. 11) that Bodies operate
a
24.
a 23
Reptible
 or understopd
tablu secos nac there is somethinus in matter that oe do not understand
y impulse aud nothinus else. und se i tought rohen i vorit it, aud and yet ean conceireno other ay of thoiroperation. But ; am
sense ano sponcaneous motioa.
dicigus . Necotors incomparable Book, fhat is too bold a presomtion tolimite Gods porver in this point, by
1408
forvaris matterbus wars inconcevable tome is not only ademe
ssopratioers above rotat
in explicable aud inconcevable attraction in malter
o contiestionsi tne equitatior et px e pleates put into poies poversand ax
iimsel
eat
ne
e
oit Lecki
convinced bus tine