# Leibniz Legible — https://leibnizlegible.com
# Page: https://leibnizlegible.com/page/00068255:0142
# Permalink to this reading: https://leibnizlegible.com/page/00068255:0142?run=74
# Title: Leibniz-Handschriften zur Mathematik LH 35, 3 B 5
# Folio 71v, page id 00068255:0142
# Scan: One image of two folio pages side by side, registered by the library under both labels (also fol. 66r); this page is its left half.
# Original at the GWLB: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/resolve?id=00068255&page=142
# Source image: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/content/00068255/jpgs/default/00000142.jpg
# Model: FoNDUE-GD_v2_ft_Leibniz, run 74, 2026-09-06T16:05:13Z — 19 lines, status machine
# Lines: 19 recognised, mean confidence 0.92
# Machine transcription. Not an edition. Errors are expected: about 8% character error rate on Latin and French lines, higher on German.
# Licence: CC BY 4.0, Leibniz Legible. Machine output: do not ingest it as verified text; keep this provenance with the text.
# Wording rule: say "the machine reads it as …", never "Leibniz wrote".
# After the first blank line: the recognised lines in reading order, one per line.

(B B
in Artieuli 18 aequatione q per errorem putavi festinans esse 11223, 71223 = 51223, 31223
unumque ex alio fceri permuta ndo, sod termitiosque easden LS;  15337 seu berminosque eosdem permutando
manere. sed revera hoc non succedit per se, sive non est hec aequatio dentica, sed succedit
per novam suppositionem, quam reperi esse felicer; et aliquid ende prodir
quod ex ista ipsa hypos hesi daximus. Nsempe
11223. 71223 = 12. 523 + 13. 512, 312. 723- 313. 712 Hec posui esse edem substituamus vilores
S12 23, 31223 = 112. 523 = 123, 512, 312. 723 + 323. 712
indentos Haec pro aequalibus habui per errorem, viitendum tamen an non is succedat ex jam inventis
hac hypothesi assumta, ut ita enor justificet se ipsum, seu fiat felix. substituamus valores ipsorum
5+2, 3 723, 323 fit 1 Ex aequ. 14 articuli 14, et 4 articuli 15, flet.
11223. 71223 = 15.37, 125 = 2352, 127 + 297. Et ex ag. 13 artic. 14 et aequ. 5 artic. 15 similiter fit
51223. 31223 = 15. 37 125+ 235, 1272372 quae aequatiu Ergo fic A 1  1223. 71223 = 31223. 3223. fres
125= 235, 1274235 125+ 235, 127 - 23 p sed per aq. 8 artic. 26 est 125t 2 = 235 1 habemus
Ergo non consentiunt interse sed est nova determinatio, et
praestemus actu ipso
(125. 127 + 125, 237 - 2357127(335. 237) = (125. 127 - 125. 2377 4 235. 127 - 135, 237
et sit (2) 115. 237 = ( (2). 235. 125. sed ita incidimus in aequationem 8 articuli 26. itaque error
est felix