# Leibniz Legible — https://leibnizlegible.com # Page: https://leibnizlegible.com/page/00068281:0207 # Permalink to this reading: https://leibnizlegible.com/page/00068281:0207?run=74 # Title: Leibniz-Handschriften zur Theologie LH 1, 1, 4 # Folio 106r, page id 00068281:0207 # Scan: One image of two folio pages side by side, registered by the library under both labels (also fol. 107v); this page is its right half. # Original at the GWLB: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/resolve?id=00068281&page=207 # Source image: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/content/00068281/jpgs/default/00000207.jpg # Model: FoNDUE-GD_v2_ft_Leibniz, run 74, 2026-09-06T16:05:13Z — 86 lines, status machine # Lines: 86 recognised, mean confidence 0.88 # Machine transcription. Not an edition. Errors are expected: about 8% character error rate on Latin and French lines, higher on German. # Licence: CC BY 4.0, Leibniz Legible. Machine output: do not ingest it as verified text; keep this provenance with the text. # Wording rule: say "the machine reads it as …", never "Leibniz wrote". # After the first blank line: the recognised lines in reading order, one per line. 54. Oromasdos et Arimanius peut estre des princesdes Ast ques et des Celtoscu fes H.rosdes (eltoscythes Irmia on Herman (140) rermumines Germni Hari deti erra. sulus un Arminiqus plus aperem qua celuu des Crerusques eq Menes, Hermes on Egypte peut estre veruis des seltoscylhe setheode dis pater, rentates Laramis ara. Resus Ares, fiet Sicomutata 5s celles mastre de la Greces titans. Geans. midel. Phumoye (144 Jo2oastre Cerdon, lanes. M b. Perfictio apparet in completis, seu insalis. hamanu genest fragmenti necesseafet possibile confusio in ordinem redit, ut in perspectins, quae certo modo espiri idebent 8) Exumgeratio in malis, multae domus pauci carceres. Mathriavullo panci valde mali. Hiistoriae usus in malis hefferendist vitentur homi, hoisie pour le meilleur les haicas du soleil universel er relevent la beaute. Veux 57C qui eu donne l’effect. 13 les frois primordialites descrmpcanella et leur rayport in. Bagle demande communt se mut aves lo solt B aglius quaent quomodo maluilicum summe bonos suncto, potente, spiente. omo in idat, ja vrrzi mari. Beiss Bariu E Trinite psisat si sapientia adimx esset junctilas supiemus gradu boni, ut crimen mali foroastris systemalis exceslentia ee haenomenis consentire. Se. mulaconomeni explicat per pripeipium caeintallius, utiae pponetara sirretur a neutio nam simplex est, sed revera ad bontm vendit, per accidens admanm deseriora sequor. Oprope sealunt frigidu ext l1 (53) Melissus dira que l’homrme joivant sordre estoit hemeux mhis qu’il est rendo matheureux (Fropstre dit, quil fallort le rendre impeccable, hoc saciledictuincongnum facto hoc est jucundum pro honesto Hinc neraspla, abolitio hujus specili in qua guorantia eror, malitia se sequuntur Sy Il doje de quon fai deux principes un faisant lediable auteur du pecte, MoBhecker contre iutra ninian diaboli potestatem: Apocatastasis panteot contra victoriam diaboli, sed la ipsi (157) de lapsu di glooti ne pau sasusam ex 158) vellat Baglius dici deus velle malum hn solum permittere tribut salvin Persicius iigo peccati altior eximperse medium sed conditio est non abjicatum quod posilius possit velle portem patris (pio crimer necfinit odem combinad etecte (160) jppelotus eddem fere, praestabat rrectae voruntas: fiermittendum crimen, ne ipse pecces rectum quin optima, ne ipse peccet, pontne point manque medomnc (16i1) speciates Baili objectiones Extupta principis nuntios expedientis, quibus obstacula ipse parat per llecebras. A posse hoc fferict raivnes probandas sarlisius ad primi Elihabetam 6e artescue ad puncipem Eersabetam comparat deu cum principe daellum prohibente uttamen ut eos examinet, sib ipsisque autaliis ostendat esse in eo duelli prohibendi voluntatem (164) duri Cartesius ess coi degina t ad inti (63) Baylius nullam eo in situl vol sialia fereeae succurr deocnetum vorente de Caligula cdncta alto loco s ponente, de sathaina Medicea complice de Sitia Tiberio et filia sejam 62 (166) objectionis quaedam odiosae. de ciudoli mescricordia nis et motestiae non in de Tur praedestinatus, objecti difficultes contre les supralapsacres a surle despotitine, et surmne consideratio meta sysica contra causam moralem moralis mali. Ex eoquod solaom non omne possibile vigation de se croire elu sans fondement existat, confundunto prias necessitates Falsum deum semper melius potrissi tium, spicure chuisoppes ciceron (169) Epicurus ad contrad er cogsippu ab proea gnagtinquo amplus de 64 saglius ample de hac d pitibi le non evemen sirussippus non adeo pro necessitar Abaclardi sententra (cristdiclefi et Hbbesii cujus ration respondetur quam vulgo, putant de praeterii necessibite 1s non omnes Rgmanisci veri Baglius contrah anc opinionem eex stentia nus 66 regulua non implicante adpossibilitatem est hujus definitio sed ipse confundit impossibile cum eo quod e non est eligendum. spincta nccessitutam facit melasysicam, ut angulus sermareuli rectus necessitas bruta vtrari quidam deumi facunt indifferentem. Telix necessita recte agendi in sapient Eadiffeent 6)Ci postila deo arbitraria quae nostra ses aut certibudi; ne promissis quidem obligatur (179) Tuia dogmata improbanda, jostitida arbitrariam esse, deum non esse ei astrictam, eam quam dens tatis dens trannicus esse posset aut malum principium, et (1.) De jure de absoluto in creataras male quidam supracapsarii, Apologia satomi observat non esse nobis notam. per Ainypagdie imledurabequ easder 129) autus non recunit ad desposismum, sed ad sapientiam. cn caglius contra detensores instataae ab arbitiopendentis Viitas ad perfectionem i oti ae u ri reia ate etie us te ie rta ata ati 106 3