# Leibniz Legible — https://leibnizlegible.com
# Page: https://leibnizlegible.com/page/00068331:0128
# Permalink to this reading: https://leibnizlegible.com/page/00068331:0128?run=74
# Title: Leibniz-Handschriften zur Theologie LH 1, 4, 8
# Folio 64v, page id 00068331:0128
# Scan: One image of two folio pages side by side, registered by the library under both labels (also fol. 67r); this page is its left half.
# Original at the GWLB: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/resolve?id=00068331&page=128
# Source image: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/content/00068331/jpgs/default/00000128.jpg
# Model: FoNDUE-GD_v2_ft_Leibniz, run 74, 2026-09-06T16:05:13Z — 37 lines, status machine
# Lines: 37 recognised, mean confidence 0.91
# Machine transcription. Not an edition. Errors are expected: about 8% character error rate on Latin and French lines, higher on German.
# Licence: CC BY 4.0, Leibniz Legible. Machine output: do not ingest it as verified text; keep this provenance with the text.
# Wording rule: say "the machine reads it as …", never "Leibniz wrote".
# After the first blank line: the recognised lines in reading order, one per line.

But onts analozically such; just a5 Time and
a Line arc made to resemble one another.
For Suppose the Scripture did represent Cod
thus By three Pertons, vet iF the Trinicy of
Persons De but such a fguratire or analogical
Reprelentation ot Comethins in God, I sec
noc hon hiscrace can justits the putcins it
intoa Creed, orthe Arricles oF the Church,
eo be subserib. d and protess d, ans more than
the other fisuratire Expressions ot the
Creat Cod. And irhen a Church haS ex-
prests rejectedother Metaphorical and Scrip-
cural Representations ot Cod, Cayins, Art.
J. That Cod is vithout Body, and Parts, and
Passions; ouent. Me noc for the Tame reaton
1o reject this like Reprelentation oF the
Deitr, bY a Trinity os Persons? Theformer
Reprelentation ot him by Parts and Passions
is rejected For this reaton, becaule tis noL
Arictly true, but only a ResemblanCCOF RC-
presentation 10 us. And accordins to his
Crace, the lame reason lies for rejectins the
latter, viz. three Persons. So chat limasine
chere riI DC (BY his OraCCS aCCONNL) the
Tame reason for puctins chis into the Arri-
cles of Faith, viz. Chat G0d is without dis-
tinction of Persons, a5 wellas mithout ParEs
and Pastions. And cheretore cither his
Crace has Forlaken the Faith ot the Church,
irho rejectins cheone, and maintainins the
ocher, must be supposd to account only
one oF them an analogical Resemblance, and
ehe other to be real; or else the Church
MaY DoNibIY appear nOL to hare acted im-
parcialls and Fairir, in makins (0 great a
difference, a5 co admit the one Point inta
EhC