# Leibniz Legible — https://leibnizlegible.com
# Page: https://leibnizlegible.com/page/00068331:0130
# Permalink to this reading: https://leibnizlegible.com/page/00068331:0130?run=74
# Title: Leibniz-Handschriften zur Theologie LH 1, 4, 8
# Folio 65v, page id 00068331:0130
# Scan: One image of two folio pages side by side, registered by the library under both labels (also fol. 66r); this page is its left half.
# Original at the GWLB: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/resolve?id=00068331&page=130
# Source image: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/content/00068331/jpgs/default/00000130.jpg
# Model: FoNDUE-GD_v2_ft_Leibniz, run 74, 2026-09-06T16:05:13Z — 38 lines, status machine
# Lines: 38 recognised, mean confidence 0.89
# Machine transcription. Not an edition. Errors are expected: about 8% character error rate on Latin and French lines, higher on German.
# Licence: CC BY 4.0, Leibniz Legible. Machine output: do not ingest it as verified text; keep this provenance with the text.
# Wording rule: say "the machine reads it as …", never "Leibniz wrote".
# After the first blank line: the recognised lines in reading order, one per line.

P.8.
cannot but jude chat one oE his CrgceS Cha-
rits rould abhor eo declare in an open AC-
sembly, Thac such Men MaII without doubt
perist everlastinsly, irho beliere no more ot
C0d5 Person or Nature, Than ThaL he 1S
Creator and Governor, or wrho hare NOL 2
rorte Notionot Cod chanchese, whom HC
doubis not may BC Par d. I Mall AOL aSK
hon then can hebe pas doubt, that an A.
rian or Socinian Mall be damn’d ererlactine-
IV, Because Pwill noc suppose his Crace will
careto make sueh a Protession, or that he
cun inds che Beliet of tuch an one (nho
has ehc same Simplicitr) to be morse than
his, ot rhose Salration he ill noc admit
anY doubc.
7. Tobferre his Crace has Faild oF his
main Detion pretended in this Discourle,
viz. to manisest the Divine Foreknomledo con-
sistent with the Freedomof Man sWill. FOr,
Est. Instead oE rendrins these LnO ThinSS
consictent, he has dens d che ope ot them,
viz. Foreknomleds in Cod, proveriy ta-
Ken, tobeac aII. No since cheConsicten-
cy oE Ero PropOstiOnS erer imPIyS CaL
bochot them mas be crue, his Grace, by
his beins driren chus to denr the OnC OE
ehem, has incimated, that che TWO arc
noc consittent; and cheretore che Ticle oFhis
Discourse mishe more properis hare been,
The Divine Foreenomlede. In a Prover sensc,
not consistent withche Ercedom of MansWill,
and therefore deny d eobe in God at all. But,
21y. HC TelIS uS, ChaF Tho, properiy and
strictly taken Cod has HOL Chat ForeknOm-
leds and Onderstandins irhich we alcribe to
him.