# Leibniz Legible — https://leibnizlegible.com
# Page: https://leibnizlegible.com/page/00068331:0135
# Permalink to this reading: https://leibnizlegible.com/page/00068331:0135?run=74
# Title: Leibniz-Handschriften zur Theologie LH 1, 4, 8
# Folio 68r, page id 00068331:0135
# Scan: One image of two folio pages side by side, registered by the library under both labels (also fol. 71v); this page is its right half.
# Original at the GWLB: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/resolve?id=00068331&page=135
# Source image: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/content/00068331/jpgs/default/00000135.jpg
# Model: FoNDUE-GD_v2_ft_Leibniz, run 74, 2026-09-06T16:05:13Z — 36 lines, status machine
# Lines: 36 recognised, mean confidence 0.91
# Machine transcription. Not an edition. Errors are expected: about 8% character error rate on Latin and French lines, higher on German.
# Licence: CC BY 4.0, Leibniz Legible. Machine output: do not ingest it as verified text; keep this provenance with the text.
# Wording rule: say "the machine reads it as …", never "Leibniz wrote".
# After the first blank line: the recognised lines in reading order, one per line.

uho disturb meate People, in Merrins em theFr-
rorsoF their False Nocions oFCod And tho
he adds, that mhen such Objections are rais d, P. 17.
they must be ansiver d: Vet L donE sec hoir
his Crace can plead chis, havins told us De-
Fore, chatrhis Controversy seems at last 10 be P. 2.
laid aside as il vere by Consent of considerine.
Men os all Parrys. So chat there necded
no healine Hland in ehe case, nOr vere che
Objections rais dethat must be ansiver d. BuE
hisCrace mayi probabls, by this ACtemPE,
onlr amaken ehe Controrerr, that he omns
had at last been laid aside, by his preachins
upon a Subicet, irhich he PaYS seldom any nom
venture eo brine into the Pulpit, except some
very vouns or imprudent Preachers.
Pishard eoconceire hisCirace con d hare
ans great liopes to cure the Scepricism oF tLC
AGC, By cakins arrar che ordinars Concep-
tions ot Giods Pertections, and learine us
rithont any fx d determinate Notion oF
one estentiat Accribuce. ThC Enitarians iN-
decd have actackd the pertonal Accributes,
and almost Hasger d Ehe AGC a5 to the Fri-
niry os Persons in one God; but ther lett us
ehie essentiat Accributes sate, and maintain
theWisdom, justice and Gioodness ot ciod
mich carnest ZCal. Andnom if these must
Desiren up t00 asimproverls accributed e0
Cod, Whitber will macters cun ? Wnicher
indeed Wrhen one may noc (o much a5 Tar,
God enoms whither, iE he has proverly no
Knoleds at aII.
Whac it anocher Mon d cate his GraceS
Principles, and cel us our nocion ot the
Dniy oF Cod is but analogous, and nOL 10