# Leibniz Legible — https://leibnizlegible.com
# Page: https://leibnizlegible.com/page/00068365:0084
# Permalink to this reading: https://leibnizlegible.com/page/00068365:0084?run=74
# Title: Leibniz-Handschriften zur Theologie LH 1, 7, 6
# Folio 42v, page id 00068365:0084
# Scan: One image of two folio pages side by side, registered by the library under both labels (also fol. 43r); this page is its left half.
# Original at the GWLB: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/resolve?id=00068365&page=84
# Source image: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/content/00068365/jpgs/default/00000084.jpg
# Model: FoNDUE-GD_v2_ft_Leibniz, run 74, 2026-09-06T16:05:13Z — 41 lines, status machine
# Lines: 41 recognised, mean confidence 0.91
# Machine transcription. Not an edition. Errors are expected: about 8% character error rate on Latin and French lines, higher on German.
# Licence: CC BY 4.0, Leibniz Legible. Machine output: do not ingest it as verified text; keep this provenance with the text.
# Wording rule: say "the machine reads it as …", never "Leibniz wrote".
# After the first blank line: the recognised lines in reading order, one per line.

coatenburh. di l. Communea Romanorum est prorestantium princicium
est, doctrinam Christianorum primorum seculorum quae in libiis
sanctorum patrum et aubiquorum conciliorum reperitur esse
incorruptam. saltem quoud alticulas necessarios.
P latas quasdam possunt habere germones cum Romana ccclesia communes
sed non ideo illa quae in Romanu Ecclesia labet quod scilicet Ana
thematismis Rodam Eclesia diffiulem reddit unionem
In arsiculi fidei dibeant ex senlentra protestantum esse in
spriatura illa ut non sit opus consequentiis. Affirmant Idalen-
Nisi protestantes ex Scriplure sacia probare posset quis sit
bugi.
numerus articulorum fidei, non est eorum puincipium sufficiens
dissedent interi
Vct
Non vero possunt, nam ea in  it
argum futam ego non admitto. Suff. eit aliquem credere alticum
ig
aliquem tamessi nesciat an sit necest
Quomodo ullam controvesiam ealhocuis movebunt legirime, ne-
seientes an ob errorem neceparium ab iis recesserint
Calomicmi non possunt opendaere cur consensus interipso, et ponlificios
sundamentalior quam inter ipsos et Lutheranos. Decolum syundi
anno 263) (conlenb. pag. 3.)
4quaestio iner protestante, et pontificios an Eccelsia sit nfallibilis
Nationalis Carculomensis
controfersiatum, quo non tantum quond articulus necessariosu e enim
concedunt inquit, protest antes, et eo ipso totam causam nobis tradunt
sed an sit infatibilis Index ed dono spiritus sancti, et nomisione
Christi sine ulla restrictione ad articulos sive mimbysnecessari od
sidse non necessorios.
lurae perscripturam
confestio Helvelica , obsterior artic. 2. itam duntoxat scriplurae interpreta
ex interpretatione si
inem agnostimus quae cun
regula sidei et charilatis congruit (regula
fidei et chariculi seu onalogia fidei quid
una propostro sit fidei, altera rationis condensiosit
concedit arnhaeus si popositio illa rationis sit absoente
An si in sllogismo
necessoria, crdus contim seu metase iysdere ait
pheorogica.