# Leibniz Legible — https://leibnizlegible.com
# Page: https://leibnizlegible.com/page/00068367:0531
# Permalink to this reading: https://leibnizlegible.com/page/00068367:0531?run=617
# Title: Leibniz-Handschriften zur Theologie LH 1, 9
# Folio 266r, page id 00068367:0531
# Scan: One image of two folio pages side by side, registered by the library under both labels (also fol. 267v); this page is its right half.
# Original at the GWLB: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/resolve?id=00068367&page=531
# Source image: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/content/00068367/jpgs/default/00000531.jpg
# Model: k3-trocr@runs-615-epoch-5, run 617, 2026-10-30T12:51:04Z — 27 lines, status machine
# Lines: 27 recognised, mean confidence 0.94
# Machine transcription. Not an edition. Errors are expected: about 8% character error rate on Latin and French lines, higher on German.
# Licence: CC BY 4.0, Leibniz Legible. Machine output: do not ingest it as verified text; keep this provenance with the text.
# Wording rule: say "the machine reads it as …", never "Leibniz wrote".
# After the first blank line: the recognised lines in reading order, one per line.

r
a corpore vel ad momentum separiret
werden
e
Eß ist aber denen, so auff
die maaß von corpore philo
phiren geantwortet worden.
die propria rerum in quarto modo
waren keine actus, sondern
potentiae, welches sie per in ducti
onem exemplorum sub clausula per
matoria. Et non datur dissimir
exemplum zu behaupten ver¬
meinet. Also ist hominis
proprium nicht rihus, sondern
risibilitas, h.e. potentia nidendi
nicht admiratio, sondern poten
tia admirandi, nicht eruditio, son
dern disciplinarum sive erudi-
honis capactas. Ex pensionis prov
prium sey nicht actualis in par¬
tes divisio, sondern divisibilitas etc.
könte demnach determinata
uantitas für ein proprium
corporis nicht passiren, son
dern da es ja nicht ad prae
dicamentum qvantitatis, sondern