# Leibniz Legible — https://leibnizlegible.com
# Page: https://leibnizlegible.com/page/00068369:0086
# Permalink to this reading: https://leibnizlegible.com/page/00068369:0086?run=74
# Title: Leibniz-Handschriften zur Theologie LH 1, 11
# Folio 43v, page id 00068369:0086
# Scan: One image of two folio pages side by side, registered by the library under both labels (also fol. 38r); this page is its left half.
# Original at the GWLB: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/resolve?id=00068369&page=86
# Source image: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/content/00068369/jpgs/default/00000086.jpg
# Model: FoNDUE-GD_v2_ft_Leibniz, run 74, 2026-09-06T16:05:13Z — 30 lines, status machine
# Lines: 30 recognised, mean confidence 0.95
# Machine transcription. Not an edition. Errors are expected: about 8% character error rate on Latin and French lines, higher on German.
# Licence: CC BY 4.0, Leibniz Legible. Machine output: do not ingest it as verified text; keep this provenance with the text.
# Wording rule: say "the machine reads it as …", never "Leibniz wrote".
# After the first blank line: the recognised lines in reading order, one per line.

praesertim ubi satutaris erus est vus, quam eam sine
ratione cogente enarctabo. Deinde considero in sanctis
quibus dam patribus, non paucos fuiise errores, qui hodie
por haeresibus morito habentur, in ipsis tamen haereses
non fuisse, quia non sum tunc contranum ab Ecclesia
erat definitum. Sic quarta decimani quidam in Aria,
Rebaphizatores Fareticorum in Africa suore vin sancti;
atque inter hoss. Cyprianus, ut alios laceam; sed qui post
Si
Concilium Nicanum tatia desensebant, haeretici erant.
scilicet non sententia, sed penicacia, hareticum facit.
Porro ut quis pro pervicace et haeretico habeatur, non.
tantum necesse est, ut contrana sententia sit definita
ab Ecclesia, ses etiam ut de definitione ipsi constet, vel
debito stucho adhibito constiturum sit. Itaque Cardinalis
Bellarminus, etsi notet in ultimo concilio Lateranensi
definitam esse Supenoritatem Pontificis, non ideo ta-
nen Gallos aliosque Pasileense Consitium sequentes
conset hareticus; quia fatetur, dubitare illos utrum
vero Oecumenicum sit, illud Lateranense. Vicis.
sim C, alli non condemnant harereos Romanam (uri-
am, quia sciunt in ea Basileeris Concitii autoritatem,
post dissidium inter ipsum et dapam Eugenium
IV. non admitli. Et srmilis Oeconomiae Exempla alia
ex Historia Ecolosiastica prroferri possent. itaque posito
Pratestantes esse in errore, qui pro rerum et amimorum
statu nunc sit invinciliilis, et quidem circa quaestionem
facti, de autoritate Oecumenica ejus Concitii inspecie.
cujus definitioni stare notunt; Ecclosia autem (atho-
lica et Concitionum indubibatorum autoritatem admitler