# Leibniz Legible — https://leibnizlegible.com
# Page: https://leibnizlegible.com/page/00068376:0193
# Permalink to this reading: https://leibnizlegible.com/page/00068376:0193?run=74
# Title: Leibniz-Handschriften zur Theologie LH 1, 15
# Folio 94r, page id 00068376:0193
# Scan: One image of two folio pages side by side, registered by the library under both labels (also fol. 95v); this page is its right half.
# Original at the GWLB: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/resolve?id=00068376&page=193
# Source image: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/content/00068376/jpgs/default/00000193.jpg
# Model: FoNDUE-GD_v2_ft_Leibniz, run 74, 2026-09-06T16:05:13Z — 37 lines, status machine
# Lines: 37 recognised, mean confidence 0.94
# Machine transcription. Not an edition. Errors are expected: about 8% character error rate on Latin and French lines, higher on German.
# Licence: CC BY 4.0, Leibniz Legible. Machine output: do not ingest it as verified text; keep this provenance with the text.
# Wording rule: say "the machine reads it as …", never "Leibniz wrote".
# After the first blank line: the recognised lines in reading order, one per line.

dicetus. Omperatono enim est, conccocare ordines ompeni, non extraneo
2
rum Regum: Porro: ubi conceniendum esit. Num in Impesio? hor veromi
nime patietus, ut extranei Reges in omperio prresideant suo Concilio,
Et sane nescio num bona conscientia habefactare ita possimas Priui
legia imperatoris ? Negasr enim nequit, quod tale Concilium D’ecume
nicum, fine praesentia et voluntate contra voluntatem omperatoris si
ceptum sit seditiosum, et pri vilegio ompeni contranum, pamo contendent
Reger illi de praerogatiua cum inquirentie sumptus tales ad tam longia
quam itec conficiendum, ut hoc suppeditatum in vix speran possit
Jaceo alia quamplurima tuciur operia impedimenta, quac preden
tioribua ponderanda relinquo.
2. Fruitus nullitas. Nec enim video, quis tam operosi et can
Concilii fruitus fit futurus. Vtraque enim pars vel esit pas, quoad
vola et numerum doctorum, vel impas. Si pas fueit, nihil efficietus
et nentra cedet; si impas, potentior supprimet inferorem, quo parto r 4. a
faate tum supprimi potest veritas. Deinde si altera purs alterus do-
chinam velut erroneam condemnet, num putabimus hanc statim ac
quieturam. An non tum vel maximi onentus tumultue, seditioner et
A
bella intessina. Pars enum damnata clamabit, sibi factam incuriam
et veritatem pec muetitudinem esse suppressam.
Pauccis, sed neuose oelebers. Dn. P. Seldius, in Senctin. Atri
Jund. P. 206. demonstrat, sgnodum generalem ex partibus dissentien-
tibus coalescentem et synodicus actioner esse medium componendi
fidei controuassias neo necessarum, nec moralites possibile aut ni-
mis difficile, nec sat efficax aut conducibile, nec ab insiciis immune
Non est necessarium, quia ex confessionibus et publicis scriptis mani
fessum jamjam est, quaenam et qualis nostra sit doitrina, quibuove
fundamentia nitatus: eae fundamenta inconcussa haitenus Peteruas
Nec est medium moralites possibile, nec satio faicle, habita ratio.
ne plurum circumstantiarum tum ex parte pecsonae conuocantia
ac indicentis, velut laud. Dn. D. seldiuo l. c. dedurit: tum
ex parte obiecti cuus vicer supplent dogmata intes nos et adues
farios controvessa et sibi contradictone aduessa: tum ex passe loci, qui
foret designandus vel intra fines Impeni vel extra: non intra
eoqus etum pesuadeat Augussis. Imperaton, ut extranei Rege