# Leibniz Legible — https://leibnizlegible.com
# Page: https://leibnizlegible.com/page/00068377:0459
# Permalink to this reading: https://leibnizlegible.com/page/00068377:0459?run=74
# Title: Leibniz-Handschriften zur Theologie LH 1, 19
# Folio 228r, page id 00068377:0459
# Scan: One image of two folio pages side by side, registered by the library under both labels (also fol. 229v); this page is its right half.
# Original at the GWLB: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/resolve?id=00068377&page=459
# Source image: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/content/00068377/jpgs/default/00000459.jpg
# Model: FoNDUE-GD_v2_ft_Leibniz, run 74, 2026-09-06T16:05:13Z — 38 lines, status machine
# Lines: 38 recognised, mean confidence 0.92
# Machine transcription. Not an edition. Errors are expected: about 8% character error rate on Latin and French lines, higher on German.
# Licence: CC BY 4.0, Leibniz Legible. Machine output: do not ingest it as verified text; keep this provenance with the text.
# Wording rule: say "the machine reads it as …", never "Leibniz wrote".
# After the first blank line: the recognised lines in reading order, one per line.

divulgatione in agadtione mo plebium tranceant.
eon. 2. Epist. 4. 5. conc. Sol. 14. cap. 4. 5. sic synodum
quam non nouerant suam este fecerunt: quo etian
ritu alia synodi ipiaque a des Constantino
plitana synodur ab ocerdentalibus adoptata,
in secundi acumenici concslis nomen ac titulum
crerit. Sic quintam synodum absque sede
Les
apostolica hattam, eadem redes apostolica
probando fecit suam. Septimam quoque
synodum a ce de apostolica tota que orientuls
cacleria confirmatum, post aliquot difficuitates,
verborum ac discislinae potius quam rerum
ac dogmatum, gallicana qua non dater peerat
et tota occidentalis
surcepit Eclesta
qu’a conseasione ejus auctoritas ut in
orrente ita toto in occrdente ita invaluit
ut numquam portea in dubium revocaretur.
Et quidem sridentina synodus apud
aquos judices per rese valitura est
C
9
Lod enia ordrestantes objicient conciliven
illud non este acumenicum, eo quod in illo
cum cardolicis piscopis ipsi non rederiat
pedices. sed ab aduersa parte latum sit pedicium
huic profecto quaere la si daretur locur, nulla
umquan concilia extitistent aut extare posient.
cum nec Ricana synodus covatianos ac
donatistas admiseril, neque unquam Raretici
nesi a catholicus judicare queanr: ne que qui
ab Ecclesia secetherunt, nisi abiis qui vaitatem
CMII. an iniqua
synodi sententia
quod apatrobus
lata videantur.
servant