# Leibniz Legible — https://leibnizlegible.com
# Page: https://leibnizlegible.com/page/00068377:0461
# Permalink to this reading: https://leibnizlegible.com/page/00068377:0461?run=74
# Title: Leibniz-Handschriften zur Theologie LH 1, 19
# Folio 229r, page id 00068377:0461
# Scan: One image of two folio pages side by side, registered by the library under both labels (also fol. 228v); this page is its right half.
# Original at the GWLB: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/resolve?id=00068377&page=461
# Source image: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/content/00068377/jpgs/default/00000461.jpg
# Model: FoNDUE-GD_v2_ft_Leibniz, run 74, 2026-09-06T16:05:13Z — 32 lines, status machine
# Lines: 32 recognised, mean confidence 0.93
# Machine transcription. Not an edition. Errors are expected: about 8% character error rate on Latin and French lines, higher on German.
# Licence: CC BY 4.0, Leibniz Legible. Machine output: do not ingest it as verified text; keep this provenance with the text.
# Wording rule: say "the machine reads it as …", never "Leibniz wrote".
# After the first blank line: the recognised lines in reading order, one per line.

sit solutio quaestionis, in qua summam eptam
difficultatis reponn: etrum nempe qui ita sun taffecti
ul Ecclesia judicio re submotbunt, eosint haretici
quod corti cyjus da m concilis reoutande
idoneas outiones habere ceputeur: et eum
talio quaestio factisor, an non eo loco sint apud
deume, et inforo poli, ve aiunt, ac si illa Eclesrde
difinitio non estet edita. Hdic enim ipce.
verbis quaestionem proponir data ad Clar. es
epistola 3. fulis 1692. subditqne patres Pasilem
en ter haud alio fundamento impulsar
viveri, ul ad condescensum sujera memoratum
devenvant. Quae quidem quastis duas haber.
partes: altera est vtrum audira affectus e,
sit pertinax et haretieusr ad quam affrrma
dive: altera, utrum exepplo concilii tasileensis
suble vari possit; ad quam negative respon
demus.
e primam quidem partem. ul demonstre
mus. satuimus primum pertinacen haberi
59
eum in negatio fidei, qui sco judicio invincibi
liter adharet, post posito Ecclesia univrtaes
judicio: hareticum vero, qui eomoda senstque
est pertinax. Quo posito aio eos de quibus ggituur,
ante omnia essse pertinaces: quia quamquam
id praeferunt se ita esse comparutur a
Ecclesiastico judicio subsont neuera tamen
refragantur.
Sempe eam excusationem obtendunt,
non Eccliscae quidem universim; sed tantum
certis