# Leibniz Legible — https://leibnizlegible.com
# Page: https://leibnizlegible.com/page/00068378:0607
# Permalink to this reading: https://leibnizlegible.com/page/00068378:0607?run=74
# Title: Leibniz-Handschriften zur Theologie LH 1, 20
# Folio 304r, page id 00068378:0607
# Scan: One image of two folio pages side by side, registered by the library under both labels (also fol. 305v); this page is its right half.
# Original at the GWLB: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/resolve?id=00068378&page=607
# Source image: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/content/00068378/jpgs/default/00000607.jpg
# Model: FoNDUE-GD_v2_ft_Leibniz, run 74, 2026-09-06T16:05:13Z — 34 lines, status machine
# Lines: 34 recognised, mean confidence 0.93
# Machine transcription. Not an edition. Errors are expected: about 8% character error rate on Latin and French lines, higher on German.
# Licence: CC BY 4.0, Leibniz Legible. Machine output: do not ingest it as verified text; keep this provenance with the text.
# Wording rule: say "the machine reads it as …", never "Leibniz wrote".
# After the first blank line: the recognised lines in reading order, one per line.

Confessio Reformatorum
de Pradestinatione, de S. Cana
De Persona Christi credimus ex verbo
det
rod Christus sit otirnus, verus Deus ac verus hono, in una indirisa Persona, unicus
desus et silvator, ejusden natura cum Deo Patre, Sccundum aternam divinam generationem
juota quam est imago invisibilis Dei, ejusdem natura nobiscum in omnibus sexapto
Seccato) Scrundum conceptionem ac Partum ex Maria Virgine, per inumbratio,
nem spiritus S. Unde Maria vere est Deipara, quia juxta Angeli verba
paritara crat Filium, qui Tilius Altisrini, Filius Dei vere erat vocandus
Luc. 1. stont de Mania hac in re a Concilio Ephesino ee Chaladonpsi conclusum
Ex quo sequitur
. Quod etiam post factam unionem personalem dua in Christo natura, illarumque Propnitates
naturales distincta ac inconfusa manserint, atque ita nec humana natura in divinam conversa,
nec etiam divina mutata aut mutabilis facta sit, prout in ephes no ac Chalcedonem
si Concilio observatum contra Nestorium Entychem et alios, et prout etiam d
sensu se explicat Athanasius in symbolo dicens: Haec est recta fides, ut cre,
damus et confitcamur, quod Dominus nostet desus chustus, Dei filius, Deus et
homo est; Deus est ex substantia. Patris, ante scrula genitus, et hono ex sub
stantia Matris, in scrulo natus, perfertus Deus. perfertus homo, ex anima rationali
et humana carne subs istens, aequalis Patri serundum divinitatem, minor Patre se,
cundum humanitatem: qui liut Deus sit et hono, non duo tanca sed unus A Christus,
unus autem, non conversione divinitatis in carum, sed assumptione humanitatis in
Deum, unus omnino non consusione substantia, sed unitate deriona. Nam sicut
anima rationalis et caro unus est homo, ita Deus et hono unus M Christus.
C. Qrodgi ideo discrimen inter alios sanetos et Christum non tantum consistat in Majoribus
Christi donis, sed praecipue in Scrsonali naturae Divinae et humana unione, cujudmodi
unio nulli alii sancto usquam cum Deo intercedit, de uno At solo Christ huc
locum habet, in dpso inhabitat omnis Deitatis plenitudo corporaliter. Col. 8..
Quod exinde passio Christi non nudo ac meri hominis sit Pasoio, sed quod spte
filius Dei revera in sua Propria carne sit passus, atqi ita haec ipia dasiio propria
Dec pesio set, in arne spouio proprca, ut ita d suo opius sanpine, vel proprio suc sanguine acqui.
t abru et 20
hujus coci re sersonn dans,