# Leibniz Legible — https://leibnizlegible.com
# Page: https://leibnizlegible.com/page/00068378:0791
# Permalink to this reading: https://leibnizlegible.com/page/00068378:0791?run=74
# Title: Leibniz-Handschriften zur Theologie LH 1, 20
# Folio 394r, page id 00068378:0791
# Original at the GWLB: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/resolve?id=00068378&page=791
# Source image: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/content/00068378/jpgs/default/00000791.jpg
# Model: FoNDUE-GD_v2_ft_Leibniz, run 74, 2026-09-06T16:05:13Z — 71 lines, status machine
# Lines: 71 recognised, mean confidence 0.83
# Machine transcription. Not an edition. Errors are expected: about 8% character error rate on Latin and French lines, higher on German.
# Licence: CC BY 4.0, Leibniz Legible. Machine output: do not ingest it as verified text; keep this provenance with the text.
# Wording rule: say "the machine reads it as …", never "Leibniz wrote".
# After the first blank line: the recognised lines in reading order, one per line.

jose
s
pentus
ite
pate
et
illis
recause
fed,
at
hon
se
huld
ys
upor
ut
not
itiet.
form
ed
osinue
intra
ldbe
ather
40
etare
7 et 8 Where there is Any disserence in the nature ol Things, there Me
Consideration os that Diference alWays cletermines an Intelligent et persectly
sise Agent. Dut Dhen Ao Ways of acting, are equally et alisse quod (:as
in the instances beforementioned:) toaffirm in suih case, that hod cannot
s
aet at all, or thattis no perfection in him to be alle to art, because re
can have no external Reuson lo move him to act one Way rather than
theomer seems fo be a denymuse Eod to have in himselt any originat
si
needs
frinciple or Soller of Degmning to act, but mat he must ullos
Cas it Vere mechamcally) be altays determined by tuings extrinsick
9. suppose, that determinate Lvantilas os Matter thatis nov in the
Mored es the most copvenient for me present trame os Nature, or the
so
present state ol Things: Ano thata Treater (as Wellas a, (ess) Qvantitus
ol Matter, Mouldhave made the present frame ut the World les convenient;
et consequently Nould not have been a greater object for Eod to have
exercised his Lodnesi upon.
s
10. The vestron 2s not, What loclenius, but Whar S Paaci Nentor
1.
s
means by the Nord Sensorium, When the debate is about the sense ol s
Paac Nettons, et not about the sense of Joclenuss B0ok. D Gocleniu
tas et meEge or Car oxong other Organ ol sensation, to be the sensorina
heis certainly mistaten. Dut When Any Writer expressly explans
Nhat he means by anu term os dnt; ot Weat use is it in this case, to
inguire in Phat different senses perhaps some other Vriters have sometime
et used the same ord: Scapula explains it by domicilium, the place
11. The soul ol à Dlind Man does for this reason not see, becanse
Where the Mino resides.
No mages are conveged tore bemu some obstruction in the Way) tothe
sensorium Where the soul is present. Hon the soul ol a seing Man sees
the mages Ao Which itis present, We RnoW not. Dut Weare sure it cannot
percieve Whatitis not present toi because nommus can act, or be acted
apon, Nhereit is not.
12. God, beina omnipresent, is really present to everythinus, essentiallus
et substantiallus: His Trelence manifests itsels indeed by ils operation, bat
s
D. 
it could aot operale yf it Das nol There. The soul is not omnipresent
p
to every part osthe Lody, et perefore doet not, et cannor itsesactuallys
operale lupon every part oftle Dody, but only upon che Dram or certain