# Leibniz Legible — https://leibnizlegible.com
# Page: https://leibnizlegible.com/page/00068378:0803
# Permalink to this reading: https://leibnizlegible.com/page/00068378:0803?run=617
# Title: Leibniz-Handschriften zur Theologie LH 1, 20
# Folio 400r, page id 00068378:0803
# Original at the GWLB: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/resolve?id=00068378&page=803
# Source image: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/content/00068378/jpgs/default/00000803.jpg
# Model: k3-trocr@runs-615-epoch-5, run 617, 2026-10-30T12:51:04Z — 38 lines, status machine
# Lines: 38 recognised, mean confidence 0.73
# Machine transcription. Not an edition. Errors are expected: about 8% character error rate on Latin and French lines, higher on German.
# Licence: CC BY 4.0, Leibniz Legible. Machine output: do not ingest it as verified text; keep this provenance with the text.
# Wording rule: say "the machine reads it as …", never "Leibniz wrote".
# After the first blank line: the recognised lines in reading order, one per line.

Stourth Paßer
n. 2. This notion laudato universal Necessitis et date, bij
suppo-sing that Moines have the same relation to the will of
àmt klagent Agent, as Voig hats have to a Dialance; so that
et two Königs absolutulus indifferent, an Intelligent Agent, can no more
chwose: Cithur, than a Italance cum more itzelt in h. H. Ass.
P
on both sides are capval. Dut the alliance lies here. A
Palance is so Agent, but is merelij passive et acted upon bij the
b
Weigatis; so that, when the Weighls are eqval, the is nothing to
3
mode it. put Intelligent Deinus, are Regens, not passive, in
3
bringen morers by Motibes, as a Dialance is my Meigats; but the
S’
have Archive Bössers, et da Moretheffelius, Simetems upon the
vie w of strenque Motives, sometimes upon Werk ones, et Cometime
Were thonigs are absolutoly indifferent. In which Luther cese thère
may be very good reason to act. thoigh usso or more May4 of
actionemaditimus meinen re absoluterum indifferent. Theils Legerner Alvays
humises the contrarii, as a Principle; but quivo no Process of it,
x
2
either from the Plature of Things of the Perfections of hod.
at 4. This argument, it it was true, would prove
20
that Tod meither has credited, non can possiblig creaté any Matter
at all. For the perfectius solid worts of all Mutter, if you the
et
then of caval figure et dimensionem (which isnessays possible
in supposition) are exactlylig alike, et therefore it would be
perfectly indifferirt if this were transpossed in Platâbt verse
quently it Was impossibile Calccording to this LeArmed Author ’ s
argument, I for Todto place them in these Praeres Vherein he
diffactun at ideae them at the Creation, because hecript as
easilius have transposed offerituation. Dismis very Amy, that no
ivo Leavis, et perhupe motivo drops of water are exactly