# Leibniz Legible — https://leibnizlegible.com
# Page: https://leibnizlegible.com/page/00068400:0047
# Permalink to this reading: https://leibnizlegible.com/page/00068400:0047?run=74
# Title: Leibniz-Handschriften zur Jurisprudenz LH 2, 3, 3 (shelfmark Lh 2, 3, 3)
# Folio 24r, page id 00068400:0047
# Original at the GWLB: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/resolve?id=00068400&page=47
# Source image: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/content/00068400/jpgs/default/00000047.jpg
# Model: FoNDUE-GD_v2_ft_Leibniz, run 74, 2026-09-06T16:05:13Z — 19 lines, status machine
# Lines: 19 recognised, mean confidence 0.89
# Machine transcription. Not an edition. Errors are expected: about 8% character error rate on Latin and French lines, higher on German.
# Licence: CC BY 4.0, Leibniz Legible. Machine output: do not ingest it as verified text; keep this provenance with the text.
# Wording rule: say "the machine reads it as …", never "Leibniz wrote".
# After the first blank line: the recognised lines in reading order, one per line.

u
cenda esset Lex d ust dem
vonius Vb Camerae nnst paccut
aro process in Camera et judicii
antid obgistaque eroda.
Vrtium est in processr nostro, quodReo
permissum est separatos constituere deferi
tionales. Cum debede filo artiulos reprobu
torios, seu defensionales vel exceptionales.
Cum n debeant esse directi ad articulos prota
foriales ab actore propositos, quos endunt quibus
respondent quos linitant. Se tem non possent
poni articuli mutiles admisceri, si procederes
nn forma per meros sollogiomos, vel salter
soritas. Modo disputandi in forma
contenitus est, quia in seholis e a scholis
Cum revera nihul possit utiliu generihu
mano, quam eum constanti in deliberando
cnlis