# Leibniz Legible — https://leibnizlegible.com
# Page: https://leibnizlegible.com/page/00068450:0020
# Permalink to this reading: https://leibnizlegible.com/page/00068450:0020?run=74
# Title: Leibniz-Handschriften zur Medizin LH 3, 1, 5b
# Folio 10v, page id 00068450:0020
# Scan: One image of two folio pages side by side, registered by the library under both labels (also fol. 9r); this page is its left half.
# Original at the GWLB: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/resolve?id=00068450&page=20
# Source image: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/content/00068450/jpgs/default/00000020.jpg
# Model: FoNDUE-GD_v2_ft_Leibniz, run 74, 2026-09-06T16:05:13Z — 34 lines, status machine
# Lines: 34 recognised, mean confidence 0.97
# Machine transcription. Not an edition. Errors are expected: about 8% character error rate on Latin and French lines, higher on German.
# Licence: CC BY 4.0, Leibniz Legible. Machine output: do not ingest it as verified text; keep this provenance with the text.
# Wording rule: say "the machine reads it as …", never "Leibniz wrote".
# After the first blank line: the recognised lines in reading order, one per line.

Lorro ad Medirinae quoque usum veteres observationem sinium ac-
comodasse apparet; sed peculiari quadam ratione huc incubuerunt Auto-
res recentiores vitalii, quam vocant, Medicinae, ex quibus Laracelsus et Hel-
montius eminent, Archaeo quodam introduito, cujus appetita, viritatione
vixone et lanovore conporis actiones regerentur. Sed quicquid in his vera
est, nostris consentit; nec opus est aliquid in conpore concipere quan conti–
nentia, contenta et impetum facientia; nec alios advocare qua anima
ralibus
appetitus; ut proinde Archaeus non nisi in anima spiritibusque corponus ei
consentientibus quaeri debeat, neque vel plastico aliquo vel Hylarchico principio
aut variis per menibra principibus sive Regulis, velut Cardia nacte, Gastro
nacte et similibus indigeanus.
Sed prae caeteris vir Celeberrimus Georxius ernestus Stahlius, Medicinae
apuo Hallenses doctor, hanc doctrinam resuscitare, pirvare et ad usum practi-
cum accomodare instituit, multa inveniose observari, valgo sine atlentione
transmissa. Extant ejus dissertationes spansim editae; sed nuper justum Theoriue
corpus publicavit, quod mihi hoc in chortam conjiciendi occasionem dedit,
atque ibi quidem probe observat (p. 6. segq.) distineven dua, inter ea, quae
fiunt secundum finem et quae casu: tancetsi distinctio haec non nisi secundum
apparentias et avidentia gradus accipi debeat, casusque non nisi ignorantia
nostra locum habeat, cum omnia revera in sinem dirixantur.
Differentiam etiam inter Mechanismum et Orvanismum vrebro in-
culcat idem (p. 13. sequ.) etsi, ut verum fatear, omnis orvanismus revera sit me-
chanismus, sed exquisitior, atque, ut sic dicani, divimor: divique possit (ut jam
notavi) conpora naturae orvanica revera machinas divinas esse
Iaque quod p. 17. defenditur, esse aliquid in orvanismo, quod alienissi–
mumi sit a Mechanismo, non admiserim: nec praeclara recentiorum de-
creta everti velim, quibus recte constitutum est, nihil in corpore fieri
quod non mechanicis, id est, intelligibilibus, rationibus constet.
et licet Franciscus Linus defensor suniculi, Henricus Morus principii
hylarchici autor, aliique viri docti, (quales qui nuper ad spiritus incorporeae
consugerunt) gravitatem, attroctionem, vim Elasticam alioque id genus
ad afsistae quaedam reducere conati sint; recte tamen à Logleo, Aurmio
aliisque