# Leibniz Legible — https://leibnizlegible.com # Page: https://leibnizlegible.com/page/00068452:0134 # Permalink to this reading: https://leibnizlegible.com/page/00068452:0134?run=74 # Title: Leibniz-Handschriften zur Medizin LH 3, 1, 5d # Folio 27v, page id 00068452:0134 # Scan: One image of two folio pages side by side, registered by the library under both labels (also fol. 28r); this page is its left half. # Original at the GWLB: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/resolve?id=00068452&page=134 # Source image: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/content/00068452/jpgs/default/00000134.jpg # Model: FoNDUE-GD_v2_ft_Leibniz, run 74, 2026-09-06T16:05:13Z — 38 lines, status machine # Lines: 38 recognised, mean confidence 0.97 # Machine transcription. Not an edition. Errors are expected: about 8% character error rate on Latin and French lines, higher on German. # Licence: CC BY 4.0, Leibniz Legible. Machine output: do not ingest it as verified text; keep this provenance with the text. # Wording rule: say "the machine reads it as …", never "Leibniz wrote". # After the first blank line: the recognised lines in reading order, one per line. Quia Anima est immaterialis: ut ratio ita falsa mihi comparet. D potiuo eotrarium probare, possit, umo debeat. Hujus adsertionis meae, directe contrariae, rationem, oppono simul. Propositioni secundae, quae est: dinima non potest movere: ejusque rationi quae est Dura motues est affectio Corporis Hic quaero: An affectio Corporis, et Corpus it res una eademque 2 1. e An Corpus sit motus: et motus sit Corpus. Prudentiores, nempe realium conceptuum Compotes Statim negant et agnoscunt. Distineta esse, Exse una, et esse unum. Esse simul et esse idem: fidem facile intellectu comprehendunt, Quod mnime Metaphysicum (oilioso sengu:) Sed revera Physicum sit. Quod quacunque affectiones, mente vere dignosei possint a Corpore: Ile, licet non tam sensibus quam sola mente, separari possint, a corpore, Tamen eum etiam sunt in corpore, habeant veram diseretam et propriam exsistentiam, Ita ut non sint ipsum Corpus; neque Corpus ipsum sit hae affectiones. santo magis autem eluiescere hoc debet ex indole asfectionum, a corpore revera separabilium, nempe quae aclesse vel abesse possunt corpor, sine ulla conceptus corporalis im minutione. Drculium an vere plures centur, et non ad statim dicendum, vnum potius recidant, jam quidem non prolixe tem pus fert aisquirere: Illud satio certum est, quod Motus sit talis affectio, quae cum internis conceptibus (orporearum affectio, num (: estentia et exsistentia Corporis, qua corpus est:) nequa quam ulla ratione nedum necessitate cohareat. Siquidem facile in conceptum venire potest corpus, Id est, res