# Leibniz Legible — https://leibnizlegible.com
# Page: https://leibnizlegible.com/page/00068453:0003
# Permalink to this reading: https://leibnizlegible.com/page/00068453:0003?run=74
# Title: Leibniz-Handschriften zur Medizin LH 3, 1, 5e
# Folio 2r, page id 00068453:0003
# Scan: One image of two folio pages side by side, registered by the library under both labels (also fol. 3v); this page is its right half.
# Original at the GWLB: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/resolve?id=00068453&page=3
# Source image: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/content/00068453/jpgs/default/00000003.jpg
# Model: FoNDUE-GD_v2_ft_Leibniz, run 74, 2026-09-06T16:05:13Z — 29 lines, status machine
# Lines: 29 recognised, mean confidence 0.95
# Machine transcription. Not an edition. Errors are expected: about 8% character error rate on Latin and French lines, higher on German.
# Licence: CC BY 4.0, Leibniz Legible. Machine output: do not ingest it as verified text; keep this provenance with the text.
# Wording rule: say "the machine reads it as …", never "Leibniz wrote".
# After the first blank line: the recognised lines in reading order, one per line.

pe
e
(d.) Assesss0 erat, alia in Systemate rerum naturalium
fieri, secundum finem, alia casu. Animadversio statuit
casum non nisi ignorantia nostra locum habere, cum
omnia revera ad finem dirigantur. Responsio agnoscit
has duas sententias e diametro opponi, sed petit objectionis
afferri rationem. Ea vero jam allata fuerat, supponendo omni,
a quae fiunt, a Deo oriri, aut certe gubernari, Dum autem
cum sit sapientissimus omnia in finem dirigere Nec video
quomodo contrarium cum providentia divina omnia compleus
dea, atque adeo cum Theologia non solum revelata, sed etiam
naturali conciliari possit, nisi aliter explicetur, quam
verba sonant. (2.) Assertio potius paracloxi sui ratio
nem readere debebat, ea autem in Responsione aut nulla
aut admodum debilis assertur. Prima hac esse videtur; quod
consderatio ista inserviat, ad melius distinguenda organiea a mechazue
nicis. Sed considerandi commoditas non est argumentum. Deinu
de etsi in organicis finis sit manifestior, non tamen sequitur
n caeteris esse nullum; cum fieri possit (. Imo ex supposita pro
videntia absolutissima debeet:) ut organica nibi aliud sint,
quam machinae, ubi divina inventio et intentio magis expressa
est (3) Secundam rationem hanc invenio, quud hinc seu
quatur minima quaeque, velut motum pulvisculi, avento agita,
ti, certo causarum ordine au aeterno a Deo destituatum esse
ut fiat, et ad effectum certum inserviat. Verum hoc non
est rationem afferre, sed negare quod est in quastione.
U) Dui providentiam in Deo perfectissimam agnoseunt,
admittunt nihil eum latere aut ejus directionem subter