# Leibniz Legible — https://leibnizlegible.com
# Page: https://leibnizlegible.com/page/00068453:0018
# Permalink to this reading: https://leibnizlegible.com/page/00068453:0018?run=74
# Title: Leibniz-Handschriften zur Medizin LH 3, 1, 5e
# Folio 9v, page id 00068453:0018
# Scan: One image of two folio pages side by side, registered by the library under both labels (also fol. 8r); this page is its left half.
# Original at the GWLB: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/resolve?id=00068453&page=18
# Source image: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/content/00068453/jpgs/default/00000018.jpg
# Model: FoNDUE-GD_v2_ft_Leibniz, run 74, 2026-09-06T16:05:13Z — 33 lines, status machine
# Lines: 33 recognised, mean confidence 0.98
# Machine transcription. Not an edition. Errors are expected: about 8% character error rate on Latin and French lines, higher on German.
# Licence: CC BY 4.0, Leibniz Legible. Machine output: do not ingest it as verified text; keep this provenance with the text.
# Wording rule: say "the machine reads it as …", never "Leibniz wrote".
# After the first blank line: the recognised lines in reading order, one per line.

quoniam omnibus anima praeceptionibus et intentio,
nibus, corporeasigurae motionesque respondent, eoe
quibus effectus in Machina sequuntur, quos proinde
lactuationi animae, ratione quadam plusquam mecha,
nica influentis tribuere, nihil necesse est. Quemadu
modem etiam aliunde constat, fieri omnino non posse,
ut talia ab anima prastentur, nisi animam ipsam
pro corporetenui habeamus. Utilis interdum hac au
nimae pathematum consideratio est, quia ea illio cognoscere
possumue multa, quae in corpore fiunt, Cum anima nobis
sit corpore notior. Et efsicere etiam multa, quae in corpore
producere volumus. Nam affectibus eacitatis aut sopitis
per causas morales; in anima effectus phissivos per causas
physicas respondentes in corpore obtinere licet.
Iaq non raro praxis assertionis stare potent, et si theoria van
ilet. Quod etiam de multis aliorum Medicorum doctrinis
diri potest. Nam praxis phanomenis madificari debet;
theoriae non raro hypothesibas et conjecturis constant.
(2.) Non putem omnia animi pathemata morematam et
erroneam intentionem continere, etsi sape noceant, dum ay
nimum a cogitationibus majoris momenti avertant. Quin
potius necessarios affectus censeo, artisque esse, illis tanquam
stimulis uti ad bona, tum morali, tum etiam physico sengu,
physico inquam, ut fecit ille Medicus, qui ad obtinendam la,
xantium efficaxiam languentem patientis sui, hominis admon
dum Atoici, tilem excitare tentavit, id diu frustra agens, ud domeq
Atieorum pecratis ad iram commoveretur. hebres inter,
dum terrore pulsas constat, sed raro juvat, pleramque
noc et terror, quod maaime in peote patet.
(3. Nescio an injuriam fecerim autori, quod ejus
sententiam qualis illa est de causa sphaceli in homi,
ne ob mordinatos hominum affectus; conjecturam
appellavi.