# Leibniz Legible — https://leibnizlegible.com
# Page: https://leibnizlegible.com/page/00068453:0033
# Permalink to this reading: https://leibnizlegible.com/page/00068453:0033?run=74
# Title: Leibniz-Handschriften zur Medizin LH 3, 1, 5e
# Folio 1r, page id 00068453:0033
# Scan: One image of two folio pages side by side, registered by the library under both labels (also fol. 2v); this page is its right half.
# Original at the GWLB: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/resolve?id=00068453&page=33
# Source image: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/content/00068453/jpgs/default/00000033.jpg
# Model: FoNDUE-GD_v2_ft_Leibniz, run 74, 2026-09-06T16:05:13Z — 25 lines, status machine
# Lines: 25 recognised, mean confidence 0.98
# Machine transcription. Not an edition. Errors are expected: about 8% character error rate on Latin and French lines, higher on German.
# Licence: CC BY 4.0, Leibniz Legible. Machine output: do not ingest it as verified text; keep this provenance with the text.
# Wording rule: say "the machine reads it as …", never "Leibniz wrote".
# After the first blank line: the recognised lines in reading order, one per line.

1)Assertio erat, alia in hystemate rerum naturalium
fieri secundum finem, alia casu. Animadversio statuit casum
non nisi ignorantia nostra locum habere, cum omnia revera
ad finem dirigantur. Responsio agnoscit has duas sententiase
diametro opponi, sed petit objectionis afferri rationem. Ca vero jam
allata fuerat, supponendo omnia quae fiunt, à Deo orvri aut certe
gabernari, Deum autem cum sit sapientissimus omnia in finem
dirigere. Nec video quomodo contrarium cum providentia divine
omnia complexa, atque adeo cum Theologia non solum revelata, sed
etiam naturali conciliari possit, insi aliter explicetur quain verba
sonant. (2.) Assertio potius paradoxi sui rationem reddere debe
bat, ea autem in Responsione aut nulla aut admodum debiles
affertur. Prima haec esse videtur, quod consideratio ista inserviat
ad meluis distinguenda organica a mechaniuis. Sed considerandi
commoditas non est argumentum. Deinde etsi in organuis finis
sit manifestior non tamen sequitur in caeteris esse nullum; cum
fieri porit (imo est supposita providentia absolutisima debeat)
ut organica nihit aliud sint quam machina, ubi divina inventio
et intentio magis expretra est. (3) Sccundam rationem hanc
invenio, quod hinc sequatur minima quaeque, velut motu put,
agitati,
visculi à vento, certo causarum ordine ab aeterno à Deo destina
tum esso ut fiat, et ad effectum certum inserviat, Responsio
non admistit quod derum hoc non est rationem afferre, sed negare
quod est in quaestione. (1) Lui providentiam in Deo perfectisrimant