# Leibniz Legible — https://leibnizlegible.com # Page: https://leibnizlegible.com/page/00068453:0035 # Permalink to this reading: https://leibnizlegible.com/page/00068453:0035?run=74 # Title: Leibniz-Handschriften zur Medizin LH 3, 1, 5e # Folio 2r, page id 00068453:0035 # Scan: One image of two folio pages side by side, registered by the library under both labels (also fol. 1v); this page is its right half. # Original at the GWLB: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/resolve?id=00068453&page=35 # Source image: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/content/00068453/jpgs/default/00000035.jpg # Model: FoNDUE-GD_v2_ft_Leibniz, run 74, 2026-09-06T16:05:13Z — 26 lines, status machine # Lines: 26 recognised, mean confidence 0.98 # Machine transcription. Not an edition. Errors are expected: about 8% character error rate on Latin and French lines, higher on German. # Licence: CC BY 4.0, Leibniz Legible. Machine output: do not ingest it as verified text; keep this provenance with the text. # Wording rule: say "the machine reads it as …", never "Leibniz wrote". # After the first blank line: the recognised lines in reading order, one per line. omnem organismum niti mechanismo seu praesupponere mecha nismum. Sed hoc non est satis, addi enim debet organis mum nihil aliud esse formaliter quam mechanismum, etsi ex quisi fiorem et diviniorem; quia omnia in natura fieri debent mecha nucé. Oujus ratio dudum allata fait in discursu objectionibus addito, quia omnia debent ita fieri in corporibus, ut possibile sit ea ex natura corporum, id est ex magnitudine figura et legibus motus distincte explicari, et hoc est quod mechant cum appellamus. Cum allegali Boylium et Htarmium, et alios, non ad autori tatem eorum sed rationes provocal, ne repetere eas necerse habe rem. V. (1) Responsio repetit et fucetur assertionem hanc: Tota animae non solum indoles sed destinatio quoqe tota, quam suimus, et quantum usquam scimus versatur unica circa corporearun objecimus rerum affectiones. Hluic sententia obsectum est, quod anima destinata sit, non tantum ad cognoscendas res exfernas, sed etiam, et quidem multo magis, ad noscendum se ipsam, et per haec autorem Deum. Responsio distinguit inter physica et physieo-moralia, sed haec diotinctio assertioni addi debebat nimis certe generali, quae certe fuit, et arreverativa, quast, nihit aliud queantum asquam scimus nidi corporea affectio nes ad animae destinationem pertinerent; cum tamen scia mus non tantum corpora, sed et nos ipros et Deum, a nobis