# Leibniz Legible — https://leibnizlegible.com
# Page: https://leibnizlegible.com/page/00068453:0037
# Permalink to this reading: https://leibnizlegible.com/page/00068453:0037?run=74
# Title: Leibniz-Handschriften zur Medizin LH 3, 1, 5e
# Folio 3r, page id 00068453:0037
# Scan: One image of two folio pages side by side, registered by the library under both labels (also fol. 4v); this page is its right half.
# Original at the GWLB: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/resolve?id=00068453&page=37
# Source image: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/content/00068453/jpgs/default/00000037.jpg
# Model: FoNDUE-GD_v2_ft_Leibniz, run 74, 2026-09-06T16:05:13Z — 29 lines, status machine
# Lines: 29 recognised, mean confidence 0.96
# Machine transcription. Not an edition. Errors are expected: about 8% character error rate on Latin and French lines, higher on German.
# Licence: CC BY 4.0, Leibniz Legible. Machine output: do not ingest it as verified text; keep this provenance with the text.
# Wording rule: say "the machine reads it as …", never "Leibniz wrote".
# After the first blank line: the recognised lines in reading order, one per line.

1) Quaestio est utrum aliqua sit perceptio, ubi non ad est ani
madversio. Responsio satis ostendit mentem discursus obje
cionibus praemissi non bene fuisse perceptam, cum perceptionem
intellectui in discursu aequipollere assumsit, à quo tantum
abest, ul ne sensur quidem aequipollent. Percentio tam daté su
mitur, at etiam porset este plana confusa, sensio habet aliquid
distincti, intellectio procedit per rationes se per veritates univer
saleo, nec nisi in antudabus rationalibus observatur, ut autem
melius intelligatur natura perceptionis confusae, expendatur exem
plum jam dudum allegatum: Cum miscentur duo pulveres caeru
leus et flavus, ut inde fiat palvis coloris vicidis, tunc percipit
anima utrumque pulvispulum, nempe tam caerulcum quam flavan
nisi
nam advi pars acervi eam effcieret, pars affienet, nec à toto affice
retur; et hanc pasionem anima à parvisculo caruleo vel flavo, ejus
perceptionem voco. Sed ea perceptio confusa est, et in voudis coloirs
tunc
sensione latet, minimeque à nobis ccaraleus aut flavus color pouc
pitur, nisi ut in viridi occultatur. Et hac explicatione data, puto
certataras Responsionis dubitationes; Agnosuqe etiam quomodo
sunc derivem innumera a nobis percini in corpore quoque nostro
quae ob exiguitatem rei, aut ob consuetudinem (id est ob exiguita
tem impressionis) non sentimus.
e
Non intelligo Responsionem, columbarum reditus ad nota colum
baria à corporeis impresionibus fieri negantem. Lonne radii
lucis, itemque propagationes Sonorum, odorunque sunt corporea un
premones. Nonne canes odorem, et similia effluvia tenuinima
sequantur, cum per multa miliaria viam inveniunt. Idem de