# Leibniz Legible — https://leibnizlegible.com
# Page: https://leibnizlegible.com/page/00068453:0046
# Permalink to this reading: https://leibnizlegible.com/page/00068453:0046?run=74
# Title: Leibniz-Handschriften zur Medizin LH 3, 1, 5e
# Folio 7v, page id 00068453:0046
# Scan: One image of two folio pages side by side, registered by the library under both labels (also fol. 8r); this page is its left half.
# Original at the GWLB: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/resolve?id=00068453&page=46
# Source image: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/content/00068453/jpgs/default/00000046.jpg
# Model: FoNDUE-GD_v2_ft_Leibniz, run 74, 2026-09-06T16:05:13Z — 29 lines, status machine
# Lines: 29 recognised, mean confidence 0.98
# Machine transcription. Not an edition. Errors are expected: about 8% character error rate on Latin and French lines, higher on German.
# Licence: CC BY 4.0, Leibniz Legible. Machine output: do not ingest it as verified text; keep this provenance with the text.
# Wording rule: say "the machine reads it as …", never "Leibniz wrote".
# After the first blank line: the recognised lines in reading order, one per line.

surdi, quantitates incommensulabiles, vis agendi, cogitatio ipsa.
(2) Postulare ut divisio corporis in infinitum probetur experien
tia, est postulare ut insensibilia ostendantur sensibus. Talia
ratione indabitata constant.
(3) Posito corpus quod libet sabdivedi posse non sequitur, quamlibet
mixti partem posse toti similem esse, ex. g. quamlibet partem
denarii quantumvis parvam ex cupro et argento mixtam esse
nec sequitur, nec concedi potest:
posse, (prorsus quemadmodum fieri non potest, ut quaevis par
ticula acervi ex tritico et hordeo confusi, ex tritico et hordeo
composita sit; et si quodvis granum, vel tritir vel horder, rur
sus in partes secari possit. et frustranea est acribologiae
affectatio un Responsione quae saepe expressiones meas corri
gere audet, quasi non ex meditatione diutina, sed tumulta,
aria scriptione profectas.
4) Cgo ne umbram quidem rationis invenio, ex qua sequatur,
dari porse corporis partes, qua nultas rursus partes habere pos,
sint. Atd doctrinam de Mistione Atriototeluco-Scholartuam
res illa nullo modo facit, quamvis nunc nolim disputare
an ipse Aristoteles eam ad nem facere putapit.
de perpetua divisibilitate
(5) Sententiam nostram probatione destitutam censet Re,
sponsio. Quasi non pro ea extent libri pleni demonstratio
nibus. Et Animadversio obiter et paucis argumentum alle
gavit, quod sicco, (ut saepe fit) pede praeteritur in Responsione
. Sempe quod Linea rectae haec natura et proprietas
reuproca est, ut sit linea, in qua pars est similis toti. Iaque
aut negandum est esse in rerum natura veras lineas rectas,
aut dicendum quam libet linea recta partem, rursus habere