# Leibniz Legible — https://leibnizlegible.com
# Page: https://leibnizlegible.com/page/00068453:0057
# Permalink to this reading: https://leibnizlegible.com/page/00068453:0057?run=74
# Title: Leibniz-Handschriften zur Medizin LH 3, 1, 5e
# Folio 13r, page id 00068453:0057
# Scan: One image of two folio pages side by side, registered by the library under both labels (also fol. 14v); this page is its right half.
# Original at the GWLB: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/resolve?id=00068453&page=57
# Source image: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/content/00068453/jpgs/default/00000057.jpg
# Model: FoNDUE-GD_v2_ft_Leibniz, run 74, 2026-09-06T16:05:13Z — 33 lines, status machine
# Lines: 33 recognised, mean confidence 0.96
# Machine transcription. Not an edition. Errors are expected: about 8% character error rate on Latin and French lines, higher on German.
# Licence: CC BY 4.0, Leibniz Legible. Machine output: do not ingest it as verified text; keep this provenance with the text.
# Wording rule: say "the machine reads it as …", never "Leibniz wrote".
# After the first blank line: the recognised lines in reading order, one per line.

(19) Sed qui immortalitatem animae ex solo fidet lumine, et Divina gratea
id est miraculosa et extra ordinaria operatione
derivant, Theologiam naturalem debilitant et plurimum Aeligioni nocent
cujus pimaria et perpetua capita (velut providentia Dei, et immortali
tas anima) ratione niti debent.
(20) Quod vero objiit Responsio quae quod naturaliter inciniunt, natur
raliter desinere porre, recte pronuntiatur, non recte objuitur: nam
dicendum est substantias simplices nec incipere nec finire naturaliter
(21) Cum omnia in corpore mechancié fieri statuo, non ideo ese quisitat
pororum figuras moror; et pluo hic motibus quam figuris tribuo.
(22) Responsio tandem huc descendit, ut neget animam esse immate
rialem. Hoc admino fateor cersarent argumenta quibus ostendi
mus animam non porse novum motum novamque directionem dare
corpori. Sed quia indes sequeretur animam revera ese corpuo, hine
quamvis ex falsa ratione,
consequens foret, (contra mentem Responsionis) omnia revera mecha
nuce fieri, seu per motuum leges. Caeterum argunenta pro imma
terialitate aut immortalitate anima quae Responsie producit, et
refutare stadet, longe differunt à meis, pro parte supra allatio
(23) Motam differre à corpore verum est, sed cum nihil sit aliud
quam loci mutatio, patet non esse nisi accidens corporis etsi ejus
accidentis
Tausa ex sola materia deduir non porsit. Causa motus incorporea
est, sed subjectum motus est corpus. Itagus dicere motum etre rem
incorpoream et immaterialem, est abusus loquendi, pari jure dice
tur etiam figuram esse rem incorpoream. Son motus imprimit
efficaciam corpori, sed causa motus. Et nivium profecto videtur
nuper propugnatam fuisse Animae materialitatem, nunc propugno
ri Motus immaterialitatem.
C
(24) Mbrum etiam paradorum affert Responsio, quod Motus res
(et quae subsistere spossit
sit per se existeno; lcet corpori non insit. Shoc est mutare