# Leibniz Legible — https://leibnizlegible.com
# Page: https://leibnizlegible.com/page/00068502:0064
# Permalink to this reading: https://leibnizlegible.com/page/00068502:0064?run=74
# Title: Leibniz-Handschriften zur Philosophie LH 4, 1, 4a
# Folio 15v, page id 00068502:0064
# Scan: One image of two folio pages side by side, registered by the library under both labels (also fol. 12r); this page is its left half.
# Original at the GWLB: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/resolve?id=00068502&page=64
# Source image: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/content/00068502/jpgs/default/00000064.jpg
# Model: FoNDUE-GD_v2_ft_Leibniz, run 74, 2026-09-06T16:05:13Z — 43 lines, status machine
# Lines: 43 recognised, mean confidence 0.96
# Machine transcription. Not an edition. Errors are expected: about 8% character error rate on Latin and French lines, higher on German.
# Licence: CC BY 4.0, Leibniz Legible. Machine output: do not ingest it as verified text; keep this provenance with the text.
# Wording rule: say "the machine reads it as …", never "Leibniz wrote".
# After the first blank line: the recognised lines in reading order, one per line.

a sese absint. Causa igitur afferenda et, cur aliquando
duo cubi A et B cohaereant parallelepipedum formum
AB constituant, quod sala parte A impulsa moveatiu
totum; seu eur enbus A inpulsus secum trahat cubum B
adeoque quaeritur causa tractionis in natura. Sunt quidam
eglegu Viri qui ipsam perfectan unitatem causam formitulis
ese ajunt; eamque sententiam video placerer
paralle seea
dationis. Dempe si qua sit atomus paratetipoda AB
quae mente sit divisibilis in duos illes cabos A et B:
re autem non divisa, eam dicunt ne etiam Livisibilen
non esse, semperq firmen manturam. His multa obstant
prinum enim nullam afferunt demonstrationem dicti
Ponamus in Parallelepipedum AB duas atones. D et 
ipsis cubis A et D Bedris suis anterioribus respondentes.
simul in currere directionibus parallelis ad hedram communem
cuborum A et B, et quid en D, venienten netrorsun à
plaga F, tota sua hedra incurnere in totan heduam
congruentem A, similiterque Evenientem antrortum
à plaga G’incurrere in di; quaeritur cauta cur A non
propellatur versus G, deserto B, et cur B non propellator
in contrarium versus F deserto A. Hujus ego in dictis
rationem invenio nullam. Quid aliud enim icanum
hic est, unum componi ex duobus cubis A et B, quam eos acta esse
non esse divisos. Luod si cam quibusdam dicas, in continuo
ante actualem divisionem nullas esse partes, alteratuum
sequetur, vel id separationi non obstare, cun scilicet natio
Ed actualem quandam divisionem tendens adeoque partes velat
designans ac distinguens scontactus nempe incurrentium
Det E) supervenit, vel continuum nullam unguam in
partes posse divelli. Luid ergo si dua Atomi Cubicae
A et B prius diversae semet ita sibi accedant, ut heduae
contactus
earum dud congruant, nonne hoc (nomento contuetus nihil
different ab atomo illa paralle lepipida AB paulo ante descripta
Iaque eapientur a se nutuo duae Atoni, simplici contacta
velut viseo quodam; idemque fieri debet, etiante pertes tantum
hedrarum congruant. Et his porro segnitur progresse naturae
continue debere crescere atomos, instar pilae nivis per niven
provolutae, ac tandem futurum ete, ut omnia in plus quam
adanantinam duritien coalescant, et eterna glacie obtorpeseant
quandodo causa coalitionis datur, disolationis non datur. Unaa
effuguem