# Leibniz Legible — https://leibnizlegible.com
# Page: https://leibnizlegible.com/page/00068502:0067
# Permalink to this reading: https://leibnizlegible.com/page/00068502:0067?run=74
# Title: Leibniz-Handschriften zur Philosophie LH 4, 1, 4a
# Folio 17r, page id 00068502:0067
# Scan: One image of two folio pages side by side, registered by the library under both labels (also fol. 10v); this page is its right half.
# Original at the GWLB: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/resolve?id=00068502&page=67
# Source image: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/content/00068502/jpgs/default/00000067.jpg
# Model: FoNDUE-GD_v2_ft_Leibniz, run 74, 2026-09-06T16:05:13Z — 46 lines, status machine
# Lines: 46 recognised, mean confidence 0.96
# Machine transcription. Not an edition. Errors are expected: about 8% character error rate on Latin and French lines, higher on German.
# Licence: CC BY 4.0, Leibniz Legible. Machine output: do not ingest it as verified text; keep this provenance with the text.
# Wording rule: say "the machine reads it as …", never "Leibniz wrote".
# After the first blank line: the recognised lines in reading order, one per line.

59.) Cun corpas vi externa impellitio in fluido,
putat Aator haac , esi ua non sufficiat ad corpus mo-
vendum, movere tanen concurcendo cum ullis particulis 
flacdi haic motai faventibus, et determinare reliquas, ut
etiam faveant, notu suo retento, determinatione vero seu
directione nutata. Adde qua autor habet artic. 56) et
in ejus demonstratione atic. 57. Unde stabuit corpus
durum in fluido motum non tolum suum notum mutuori
a duro impellente, sed partim etiam a fluido circunjacente,
dd haec non ipse dlesoruere videtur artic. 60 et omnino nequicquam
nagum dicta aroitior, cum et falso principio nitantur
quod hic rursus inculcatur quasi quies motui contraria sit,
et excogitata unice diveantur ad salvandam contrarcetatem
quam phaenomena habent dam regula quarta notus a nostro
auttre posita, qua nale negatuforpus quiescons à minore, quanta-
cunque celeritate acto posse hapelli (vid fin. artic. 6d)) cum
tamen ipse fareri cogarur artic. 56, corpus durum in fluido
existens a minimavimoveri. Itaque ut effugiat difficultatem,
miro commento utitur puticulasque fluido in auxilium advocut
frustra; nam à contraris compensatae nilit praestant, et, si
quid efficerent minium praestarent, motunque mobili majorem
quam à vi inpellente proficisci debet, darent. Cum tanen
motu
constet, nec majorem motum adeoque nec alium, in mobili
oriri, quam si aihil omnino a fluido ageretur. Luin
contra potius dicendum est, adeo nil notui addere fluidum
ut potius detrahat nonnihil, velocitatemque nobilis diminuat
partim ob aliquam tenacitatem adm istam partia etiam
en eo solo quod ingresta duui in fluidum pars fluidi volumine
aequalis duro, continue pellenda loco, atque in motum concit anda est
esnovum; in quam rem aliqua pars potentie mobilis
inpendenda est. Lnantitatem utriusque hajus resistentie,
quarum una absolata est, seu per eaddem, in eodem fluido;
altera vero respectivn, et cun notus velocitate crescens
objectioni
ferreun. Learctus nodus in scirpo detortaeque quaestion
par responcio accommodatur. Nimirum si corpus quiescens
à majori noveri potest, queritur cur manus partem cloi
ferrei se multo minorem, licet qui escenten, non moveat
nec à reliqua parte avellat. Causan rejicit in mollitien
manus, quae ideo non tota, sed sui parte tantam, agit in
clavum,
in qua
ad calculum alibi revacau.
63.) Mirisica sunt, quae lic tradantur
de causa eur manus noitrae non possint numpere claq