# Leibniz Legible — https://leibnizlegible.com
# Page: https://leibnizlegible.com/page/00068502:0094
# Permalink to this reading: https://leibnizlegible.com/page/00068502:0094?run=74
# Title: Leibniz-Handschriften zur Philosophie LH 4, 1, 4a
# Folio 11v, page id 00068502:0094
# Scan: One image of two folio pages side by side, registered by the library under both labels (also fol. 10r); this page is its left half.
# Original at the GWLB: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/resolve?id=00068502&page=94
# Source image: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/content/00068502/jpgs/default/00000094.jpg
# Model: FoNDUE-GD_v2_ft_Leibniz, run 74, 2026-09-06T16:05:13Z — 30 lines, status machine
# Lines: 30 recognised, mean confidence 0.98
# Machine transcription. Not an edition. Errors are expected: about 8% character error rate on Latin and French lines, higher on German.
# Licence: CC BY 4.0, Leibniz Legible. Machine output: do not ingest it as verified text; keep this provenance with the text.
# Wording rule: say "the machine reads it as …", never "Leibniz wrote".
# After the first blank line: the recognised lines in reading order, one per line.

motus in loco pleno involuat circulationem, et quod necesse
sit materiam actu dividi alicubi in partes data quauis mi-
noces, cuius postremae conclusionis momentum nion videtur
ipse satis expendisse.
(36) Fandlem motus quantitatem conservari in rebus
celebratissima est sententia Cartesianorum; demonstra-
tionem tamen nullam dedere, nam quae hic ratio su-
mitur a Constantia Der, quam debilis sit, nemo non vi-
det, quoniam etsi constantia Dei summa sit, nec quicquam
ab eo nisi secundum prascriptae dudum seriei leges ma-
tetur, id tamen queritur quidnam conseruare decre-
verit, otrumne quantitatem motue, an aliud quiddam
Ame vero demonstratum est eandem potius consercri
quantitatem virium amotus quantitate diuersam et sapis-
sime contingere, ut quantitas motus mutetur. Quibus
argumentis hoc euicerim, et ab obiectionibus vinde-
cauerim, alibi legi pluribus potest. Quia tamen ma-
gnimomenti res est meditationis meae fontem summa-
tim aperiam in exemplo. Sint duo corpora Amole ut 4.
celeritate ut L, et B mole ut 1. celeritate vto, seu qui-
escens; ponamus vel fingamus effici ut mox A rediga-
tur ad quietem, B vero solum moneatur, vel quod idem
est totam vim ipsius A, transferri in B; quaritur
quantum celeritatis mancisci debeat B. Secundum
Cartesianos respondebitur debere B habere celerita-
tem ut 4; ita enim quantitas motus pristina et prae-
seno aequabuntur; quia moles q. in celeritatem 1. tan
tum producit, quantum moles 1. inceleritatem 4. ce-
leritate scilicet intantum aucta in quantum diminutum fuit
corpuo.