# Leibniz Legible — https://leibnizlegible.com # Page: https://leibnizlegible.com/page/00068502:0099 # Permalink to this reading: https://leibnizlegible.com/page/00068502:0099?run=74 # Title: Leibniz-Handschriften zur Philosophie LH 4, 1, 4a # Folio 14r, page id 00068502:0099 # Scan: One image of two folio pages side by side, registered by the library under both labels (also fol. 15v); this page is its right half. # Original at the GWLB: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/resolve?id=00068502&page=99 # Source image: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/content/00068502/jpgs/default/00000099.jpg # Model: FoNDUE-GD_v2_ft_Leibniz, run 74, 2026-09-06T16:05:13Z — 31 lines, status machine # Lines: 31 recognised, mean confidence 0.98 # Machine transcription. Not an edition. Errors are expected: about 8% character error rate on Latin and French lines, higher on German. # Licence: CC BY 4.0, Leibniz Legible. Machine output: do not ingest it as verified text; keep this provenance with the text. # Wording rule: say "the machine reads it as …", never "Leibniz wrote". # After the first blank line: the recognised lines in reading order, one per line. ita autem concepta est: Vnum corpus alteri fortiori occur- rendo nihil amittit de suo motu, sed tantum mutat deter- minationem accipere tamen aliquid motus a fortiori po- test; occurrendo autem minus forti, tantum amittit quan- tum transfert. Verum enim vero ot corpus fortiori impingendo nihil amittat de suo motu, sed celeritatem vel retineat, vel augeat tantummodo locum habet irr Casu concursus contrarii; sed quando corpus debilius ettamen celerius impingitur fotiori tardius ante- cedenti, quod scilicet assequitur, tunc contrarium eue- nit, genecaliterque verum esse reperro observari a natuca aliud assequentis ut corporis celeritat ictu im- minuatur. Nam si continuet motum postictum otique continuare eum priore celeritate non potest, nisi eam et antecedenti tribuat, quo casu in summa augeretur apotentia aggregatum. Se quiescat post ictum persepa test celeritatem ejus esse ictu imminutam, imo subla- tam. Contingit autem qures induris, quae semper subintelligo, cum ratio excessus praecedentis super asse- quens est ad assequens duplum, ut celeritas praeceden- tis ad celeritatem assequentis. Sive reflectatur in- currens corpus post assecutionem, ruosus patet mo tum reflexisse minotem quam ante, alioqui cum a superueniente incurrentis impulsu necessario aucta sit celeritas excipientis seu praecedentis, otique vo- lentibus nobis ipsius quoque insequentis, et iam re- flexi celeritatem augere, vel saltem eandem quae prius retinere totius potentiae aggregatum aurtum prodiret, quod absurdum est. Siquis excusando Car- tesio excipiat, hanc Teitiam ejus legem de occursu corponem