# Leibniz Legible — https://leibnizlegible.com
# Page: https://leibnizlegible.com/page/00068502:0107
# Permalink to this reading: https://leibnizlegible.com/page/00068502:0107?run=74
# Title: Leibniz-Handschriften zur Philosophie LH 4, 1, 4a
# Folio 18r, page id 00068502:0107
# Scan: One image of two folio pages side by side, registered by the library under both labels (also fol. 19v); this page is its right half.
# Original at the GWLB: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/resolve?id=00068502&page=107
# Source image: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/content/00068502/jpgs/default/00000107.jpg
# Model: FoNDUE-GD_v2_ft_Leibniz, run 74, 2026-09-06T16:05:13Z — 31 lines, status machine
# Lines: 31 recognised, mean confidence 0.98
# Machine transcription. Not an edition. Errors are expected: about 8% character error rate on Latin and French lines, higher on German.
# Licence: CC BY 4.0, Leibniz Legible. Machine output: do not ingest it as verified text; keep this provenance with the text.
# Wording rule: say "the machine reads it as …", never "Leibniz wrote".
# After the first blank line: the recognised lines in reading order, one per line.

aequali. Haec regula non minus falsa est quam praecedens
necminus cum rationibus quam experimentis pugnat
Nam vtnostrum Criterium applicemus, B. celerius
secum abripiat tardius modo dicto, ex hypothesi et de-
crescat continue celeritas ipsius B. donec siant ambae
aequales, seu quod eodem reclit donec excessus cele-
ritatis B. supec C. Siat incomparabiliter parvus
itaque tunc ambo secentur senul celeritate ipsius
B. nulla assegnabili quantitate diminuta quod est
absucdum, et contrat regulam primam, quae recte
statuit in casu perfectae tam in magnitudine quam
in velocitate paritatis, vel saltem in casu ab hoc in
assignabiliteo differente ambo sua aut saltem inassi–
gnabiliter aucta vel diminuta celeritate reflecti
Necfieri potest ut eventus maequalitatis
enanescentis in euentum non evanescat.
(49) Reg. 4. Si B. sit minus quam C, et B. moneatur,
C. vero quiescat, B reflectetus qua venit celeritate, C. vero
manebit quiescens. Hac regula in eo vera est, quol minus
semper amaiore quiescente reflectitur; scdnon ea qua
venit celeritate, nam quo magis decrescet excessus ipsius
B, eo magis decrescet repulsa, donec tandem perveniatur
ad casum aequalitatis, de quo req. sexta; et absurdum est
hypothesibus paulatim adcasum aequalitatis corporum
accedentibus, euentus quoque non paulatim ad eum
accedere, sed semper eosdem manere, donec postea ono
ictu velut per sattum ad eum transeatur. Et sane facile
quivis intelligit etiam illud a ratione alienum esse, ut
hypothesis continue variata, nihil variet euentum, excepto
casu singulati determinato, cum contra potius in ominibus
recum