# Leibniz Legible — https://leibnizlegible.com
# Page: https://leibnizlegible.com/page/00068502:0110
# Permalink to this reading: https://leibnizlegible.com/page/00068502:0110?run=74
# Title: Leibniz-Handschriften zur Philosophie LH 4, 1, 4a
# Folio 19v, page id 00068502:0110
# Scan: One image of two folio pages side by side, registered by the library under both labels (also fol. 18r); this page is its left half.
# Original at the GWLB: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/resolve?id=00068502&page=110
# Source image: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/content/00068502/jpgs/default/00000110.jpg
# Model: FoNDUE-GD_v2_ft_Leibniz, run 74, 2026-09-06T16:05:13Z — 32 lines, status machine
# Lines: 32 recognised, mean confidence 0.98
# Machine transcription. Not an edition. Errors are expected: about 8% character error rate on Latin and French lines, higher on German.
# Licence: CC BY 4.0, Leibniz Legible. Machine output: do not ingest it as verified text; keep this provenance with the text.
# Wording rule: say "the machine reads it as …", never "Leibniz wrote".
# After the first blank line: the recognised lines in reading order, one per line.

B. ergo incurrente B in quiescens C. aequale, nec perget B
nec restectetur, sed (quod inter hac medium est) quiescet, tota
sua vi transtata in C.
(52) Reg. 7. S: B et C. macerentus versus eandem partem
B. quidem celerius, Ctardius, esset que C maius et maios
ratio ipsius C. ad B, quam celeritatis B. ad celeritatem C.
irent ambo simul directione priore ac celeritate quae faceret
eandem quae prius quantitatem motus. Sin C. licet maio
re existente, minos esset ratio C adB, quam velocitatis
B ad velocitatem C vel si C esset minus quam B reslecte
tur B celeritate qua venit, et perget C celeritate quapri
us, ita auctar noster. Sed haec quam in congrua sint facile
intelligitur, nam dudum potacimas corpora dura (qcalia
hicponuntur, nunquam post icum simulincedere, quod
tamen hic fit casu priore; et nihil est a ratione alienius, quam
corpus B, agendo in corpus C, nihil in ipso immutare; et
tanter plucimum ab eo pati, quod fit in cansu posteriore
pugnant ista nifallor cum Metaphysica (utita dicam,
natusali, quam nobis praebet lumen rationis. Etiam
alia insunt prioribus contraria, nam cum C est aequale
ipsi B. et celeritate incomparabiliter parua antecedit, id
est revera quiescit, locum habet casus postenor regula praece–
dentis adeoque sequetur ex hac régula C quiescens ab
aequali B non posse loco pelli, contra praecedentem, otalia
brenitatis causa taceam, non minus inconsistentia
postremo admonendum est, oblitum esse autorem casus in
termedii, cum ratio corporum est reciproca rationis celeri-
tatum, nec apparet quid vi regulae sit dicendum, deberet
enim eventus quoque esse inmelio, et omnino in ipso
confinio casus striusque; sed casus prior et postenor
regula, etsi confinium habeant in hyplothesi notitamen
confinium