# Leibniz Legible — https://leibnizlegible.com
# Page: https://leibnizlegible.com/page/00068502:0123
# Permalink to this reading: https://leibnizlegible.com/page/00068502:0123?run=74
# Title: Leibniz-Handschriften zur Philosophie LH 4, 1, 4a
# Folio 26r, page id 00068502:0123
# Scan: One image of two folio pages side by side, registered by the library under both labels (also fol. 27v); this page is its right half.
# Original at the GWLB: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/resolve?id=00068502&page=123
# Source image: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/content/00068502/jpgs/default/00000123.jpg
# Model: FoNDUE-GD_v2_ft_Leibniz, run 74, 2026-09-06T16:05:13Z — 32 lines, status machine
# Lines: 32 recognised, mean confidence 0.98
# Machine transcription. Not an edition. Errors are expected: about 8% character error rate on Latin and French lines, higher on German.
# Licence: CC BY 4.0, Leibniz Legible. Machine output: do not ingest it as verified text; keep this provenance with the text.
# Wording rule: say "the machine reads it as …", never "Leibniz wrote".
# After the first blank line: the recognised lines in reading order, one per line.

a vi impellente porficisci debet, darent. Cum tamen
constet nec maiorem motum, adeoque nec alium in mobili
oriri, quam si nihil omnino a fluido ageretur, quincon-
tra potius dicendum est adeo nil motui addere fluidum
ut potius detrahat nonnihil, velocitatem que mobilis diminu-
at, partim ob aliquam tenacitatem admistam, partim etiam
ex eo solo quod ngcessu duci in fluidum paro fluidi
volumine aequalis duro continue pellenda loco atque
motum concitanda est novum, in quam rem aliqua
pars potentiae mobilis impendenda est, cuantitatem otri-
usque hums resistentiae, quarum una absoluta est, sem
perque eadem in eodem stuido, altera vero respectiua
et cum motus veloritate crescens ad calculum alibi
revoravi.
(63) Mirifica sunt quae hic tractuntur de causa cur
manus nostrae non possint sumpere clavum ferrum. ua
ritur noilus inscirpo detortaque obiectioni par responsio
accommodatur. Nimirum si corpus quiescens amaiori
moveri potest, quaeritur cur manus partem claui ferrei
se mulito minorem licet quiescentem non moueat, nec are-
liqua parte avellat. Causam reiicit in mollitiem manus
quae ideo non tota, sed sui parte tantum agit in clavum
adeoque semper minore manus quam sit avellenda
pars claui. Verum non est quastio de motu, nam
manus non tantum partem clavi, sed istum clavum
totum facile moveat; illud potius quaeritur cuc pars
clavi reliquam partem secum tratat, nec facile oma sine
alia se moveri patiatur. Deinde inconsilerate recurritur
ad mollitiem manuo, cum etsi loco manus sumatur per-
cutiens frustum quantum ainque ferri aut saxi nihilo
minus daui partes sese trahunt; et licetcurum a duro
faci-