# Leibniz Legible — https://leibnizlegible.com
# Page: https://leibnizlegible.com/page/00068531:0130
# Permalink to this reading: https://leibnizlegible.com/page/00068531:0130?run=74
# Title: Leibniz-Handschriften zur Optik und Dioptrik LH 37, 2
# Folio 65v, page id 00068531:0130
# Original at the GWLB: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/resolve?id=00068531&page=130
# Source image: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/content/00068531/jpgs/default/00000130.jpg
# Model: FoNDUE-GD_v2_ft_Leibniz, run 74, 2026-09-06T16:05:13Z — 27 lines, status machine
# Lines: 27 recognised, mean confidence 0.95
# Machine transcription. Not an edition. Errors are expected: about 8% character error rate on Latin and French lines, higher on German.
# Licence: CC BY 4.0, Leibniz Legible. Machine output: do not ingest it as verified text; keep this provenance with the text.
# Wording rule: say "the machine reads it as …", never "Leibniz wrote".
# After the first blank line: the recognised lines in reading order, one per line.

hinc erunt sinus angulorum radiii in recipoca ratione resistentia
medioruus Quod ostendendum Jusceperamus. c jam mivari desinimus
cur aer qui lucis radiis lucis minus resistit tamen rudios a perpendiculari
velit ropellat quod ratiocinatio superior a facillima via sumta
verum quidem esse ostendebat, sed non tolledat admirationem.
(arlesium vero ea difficultas adegit, ut statueret aerem magis
resistere luci quam aquam aut vitrum; quod declarare volebat
similitudine tapetis qu villosi, in quo globulus facili difficiliis
feratur, quam in solido marmore. Sed ea similitudet minimo quadrat,
quia globulus partem suarum virium amittit in tapete, et cum
cum superavit, vim amissam non recuperat, at tadius lucis qui
un rursus ad vitnii
ab ne ex vitro in aerem venit, vim priorem remperat. Itaque
et dic privit eoangulo egreditur ex aere quo in eum
ingressus est, positis superficiebus ingressionis egressionisque parallelis
e
Agerum distinctio nostra pulchertime omnia feliciter conciliat nam
totus aer quidem est illuminabilior, adeoque luci minus resistit, sed
tamencum hinc vis lucis magis disgregetur singuli ladii fiunt
debiliores. Quare posset dici aerem extensioni lacis non residem
sed intensioni. 6. Absolute tamen dicendum est, aerer
luci minus resistere, quia ea lucis aliorumque agentium matura
est, et diffundere se nitantur; unde jam corollarii instar
deduci potest; quod via a puncto emittente radium ut C
ad punctum excipiens, sit  omnium possibilium facilliona
atque ita causae due efficiens et finalis sese mutuo demonstrant.
sed prior  magis