# Leibniz Legible — https://leibnizlegible.com
# Page: https://leibnizlegible.com/page/00068531:0138
# Permalink to this reading: https://leibnizlegible.com/page/00068531:0138?run=74
# Title: Leibniz-Handschriften zur Optik und Dioptrik LH 37, 2
# Folio 69v, page id 00068531:0138
# Scan: One image of two folio pages side by side, registered by the library under both labels (also fol. 68r); this page is its left half.
# Original at the GWLB: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/resolve?id=00068531&page=138
# Source image: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/content/00068531/jpgs/default/00000138.jpg
# Model: FoNDUE-GD_v2_ft_Leibniz, run 74, 2026-09-06T16:05:13Z — 22 lines, status machine
# Lines: 22 recognised, mean confidence 0.95
# Machine transcription. Not an edition. Errors are expected: about 8% character error rate on Latin and French lines, higher on German.
# Licence: CC BY 4.0, Leibniz Legible. Machine output: do not ingest it as verified text; keep this provenance with the text.
# Wording rule: say "the machine reads it as …", never "Leibniz wrote".
# After the first blank line: the recognised lines in reading order, one per line.

Adtuo generalius reddi potuisset problema eusus solutio, si quis nempe postulasset a nobis, non
ut radii incidentes GK a linea Kk redditi fuissent convenentes ad punctum L, vel paralleli aut
diverpentes; sed si debuissent detorqueri secundum aliquam legem datam (exempli causa perinde ac desor
lea 123F non
queri solent parellelae incidentes in arcum Circuli); tunc enim tantume loco carcus circularis 122F
describi debuisset alia linea adiaclustica radiorum refractionis desideratorum KM. quemaomodum arcus
circuli ipsorum K in L concurrentium adiaclestica est  si radii is in cidentes GL non debeant
reddi convergentes ad punctum L sed L ultra positum, sed divergentes seu ad partes B sed divemente
a puncto L citerius posito, ad partes. G, seu ita refractione detorqueri, ut pergant peuinde ac si ab eodem
omnes puncto venirent; tunc eadem erit constructio, quae in convergentibus Denique si recta debea
radii refracti. Kn essent parall esse debeant paralleli, tunc linea eorum adiaclastica est recta, itaque
patet tantum at 1Q3F deluere esse tntum rectam id eos perpendicularem. Operae pretium esset
excmpla adjicere  casus hactenus intactos saltem incircule et Conitis adicer  elegantia ceoremata habebuntur, sed
ractar
hoc brevitas h paescripta non patitur. presertim cum ea res sit i l ex ipi his quae hic diximus jam
sit in Analytici cujusque potestate
 quae solutio
cun est generalis
ut in plano generalior
e desiderari
em
videatur.