# Leibniz Legible — https://leibnizlegible.com
# Page: https://leibnizlegible.com/page/00068531:0212
# Permalink to this reading: https://leibnizlegible.com/page/00068531:0212?run=74
# Title: Leibniz-Handschriften zur Optik und Dioptrik LH 37, 2
# Folio 106v, page id 00068531:0212
# Scan: One image of two folio pages side by side, registered by the library under both labels (also fol. 107r); this page is its left half.
# Original at the GWLB: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/resolve?id=00068531&page=212
# Source image: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/content/00068531/jpgs/default/00000212.jpg
# Model: FoNDUE-GD_v2_ft_Leibniz, run 74, 2026-09-06T16:05:13Z — 33 lines, status machine
# Lines: 33 recognised, mean confidence 0.95
# Machine transcription. Not an edition. Errors are expected: about 8% character error rate on Latin and French lines, higher on German.
# Licence: CC BY 4.0, Leibniz Legible. Machine output: do not ingest it as verified text; keep this provenance with the text.
# Wording rule: say "the machine reads it as …", never "Leibniz wrote".
# After the first blank line: the recognised lines in reading order, one per line.

aequi per 8, ac per 3 aut dducta intelligi
possit. Si vero corpus B. loca tum sit in situ rpe.
apcrimen apparet. Quod ut appareat distinctius,
motum senetrationis in conatus sues resolvamus.
pe
corpus positum in d. coratur es tend il versus l
ergo mensuris conatuum db. df. Conalui in dF
resistitur a medio novo. quantum ergo resistitur
tanto minus dato tempore intrat, Transferaturo
inq it cogitetur portio de qd intrar quanta
est op. ex it quanta est pIc. q Manifestum
est corprimum conatum in df etsi refunctum
tardiorem seu impeditiorem, ob majo remnovi medii
resistentiam, indeclinatum tamen tendere ex d. in f.
nam totum eo tendit, ac proinde toti aequaliter
resistitur. Conatue autem corporis B. ex d in b
vel quod idem est ex P in d est partim in mectio
magis partim in medio minus resistente. Et quan-
tominor ejus pars est in medio minus resistente
tanto minus ei resistitur. Quanto cajor pars intra-
vit, tanto resistitur magis. Ergo quantomajor
pars in minor pars intravit, tanto fortior est
conatus ab quanto major dimidia, tanto debilior
Quanto autem fortior est ionatus inod tanto
refracta magit inclinat ad ipsam seu a per-
pendiculari, quantu debilivr tanto magis ab ipsa
seu ad perpendicularem Hinc intelligitur
ho simu lergo et conatus db. est fortior,
et conatus df. debilior, idque eudem ratione. et contra
idque proportione eadem. Sed nee hinc sequa-
tur refractio duplicata, rursus detrasendum
est aliquid. Nimirum cum conatus d
+dimidia