# Leibniz Legible — https://leibnizlegible.com
# Page: https://leibnizlegible.com/page/00068532:0043
# Permalink to this reading: https://leibnizlegible.com/page/00068532:0043?run=74
# Title: Leibniz-Handschriften zur Physica LH 37, 3
# Folio 24r, page id 00068532:0043
# Scan: One image of two folio pages side by side, registered by the library under both labels (also fol. 25v); this page is its right half.
# Original at the GWLB: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/resolve?id=00068532&page=43
# Source image: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/content/00068532/jpgs/default/00000043.jpg
# Model: FoNDUE-GD_v2_ft_Leibniz, run 74, 2026-09-06T16:05:13Z — 25 lines, status machine
# Lines: 25 recognised, mean confidence 0.95
# Machine transcription. Not an edition. Errors are expected: about 8% character error rate on Latin and French lines, higher on German.
# Licence: CC BY 4.0, Leibniz Legible. Machine output: do not ingest it as verified text; keep this provenance with the text.
# Wording rule: say "the machine reads it as …", never "Leibniz wrote".
# After the first blank line: the recognised lines in reading order, one per line.

Dre conclusione postremi sui screpti asserit el. d. quod cessasset
dudum inter nos disputatio si admisissem hanc propositionem: In duolo
corporibus concurrentibus quantitatem notus per concussuur posse
augeri et diminur, et tamen servari lalem quantitatem verium et
centrum gravitalis amtorum non possit assurcere peus minusve até
post ictum quam ante ictum. Cortum est tamen me jan dudum abmisisse
regulam motus Hlugenianam ex qu’a nacessario sequitur dictae proposeri
onis veritas: Certum est praterea quod in ipso principis nostrae disputationis
negavi quod spatia ascendendo percursa sint semper inter se sicut vires
motrices: onde sponté segnitur quod vires motrices (sive quantitates
motus secundum Cartessianos) possunt mutari in corporibus etiamsi
spatia a centro communi gravitatis ascendendo percurrenda eadem
remaneant Pive aeguivalentia: habebat igutur Vir el. Suum illud
intentum et debuisset in ipso illo principio cessare controversca:
Verum cuivit ad scripta nostra attendenti facile palebit aleum tunc
fuesse statum quastionis: volebat enim praterea el. d. exente
inferre quod vires motrices non debent aestimari ex quantitate
motus, multiplicando scilicet corporis molem per ipsius velocilatem
atque inde novam deducebat regulam translationis potentiae ex
corpore 4 cibrarum in corpus 1 librae. Haec autem Ege merito
concedere recusavi: quonquam enim nostra potentia astimatis non
possit Peare cum definitione, quam ipse. aettulit in Act. H. 1690. gra. 274.
sufficit quod dicta astimatio optime congrua eum alia definitione
quam Ego protule H. 1691. par7. quaeqi a nemine, nee cb ipso clar.
Artasonsta potet resput. Jam cgllao non meror quod me dicat