# Leibniz Legible — https://leibnizlegible.com
# Page: https://leibnizlegible.com/page/00068534:0238
# Permalink to this reading: https://leibnizlegible.com/page/00068534:0238?run=74
# Title: Leibniz-Handschriften zur Mechanik: Dynamika LH 37, 5
# Folio 121v, page id 00068534:0238
# Original at the GWLB: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/resolve?id=00068534&page=238
# Source image: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/content/00068534/jpgs/default/00000238.jpg
# Model: FoNDUE-GD_v2_ft_Leibniz, run 74, 2026-09-06T16:05:13Z — 32 lines, status machine
# Lines: 32 recognised, mean confidence 0.96
# Machine transcription. Not an edition. Errors are expected: about 8% character error rate on Latin and French lines, higher on German.
# Licence: CC BY 4.0, Leibniz Legible. Machine output: do not ingest it as verified text; keep this provenance with the text.
# Wording rule: say "the machine reads it as …", never "Leibniz wrote".
# After the first blank line: the recognised lines in reading order, one per line.

st
Corpus unum incurrit in aleud quiescens
vaudo deb corpora concurrunt, et postta ium sim  e
Verum
dubites iidetur commode defendi posit corpor
Nam ictus omnis in partibus mollibus consumtus est
cum certum videatur nullum corpus momento motum notabilem
accipere, cogitandum quomodo res explicari possit
videtur omne corpus jam tum in se eam omnem vim habere
quam unquam acquirere potest adeoque infinitam, sunt enim infiniporum
corporum motus magnae celeritatis in eo inclusi, ita ut in quolibet corpa
isit quantitas motus data finita major. Corpus omne videtur non
isi a seipso impelli, sive motu no, sive elaterio quod a motu
verum inquies cum corpus in quiescens incurrit
potu ejus partes impellit ac comprimit quam rellum elastium existere
intestino proficiscitur.
possit respondeo in omni corpore quod totum quiescit partes esse in celerrim
motu eoo magis quo est finnius, et corpus incurrens  inh
atque impellens  hunc intestinum motum partium extimarum incidere,
atque hinc reflectere illas partes.
notandum tamen motum non in se
formaliter, sed ratione causae consideran
do, posse attribui ejus corpori a cujus conta
ctu provenit mutatio.
melius exemplum praebet consistentia. Quam aliqui per
Tabulus sibi incumbentes explicant, sed rusus explicare
debent unde ipsae tabulae sint consistentes; aut fateri
se nihil perfecte explicmisse, nec rationem, firmitatis
ita
firmitatem corpori competere per se, quod absurdinne
intelligere, nisi supposita alia firmitade
si mitatem absolute non explicuera. Unde sequeretur