# Leibniz Legible — https://leibnizlegible.com
# Page: https://leibnizlegible.com/page/00068534:0245
# Permalink to this reading: https://leibnizlegible.com/page/00068534:0245?run=74
# Title: Leibniz-Handschriften zur Mechanik: Dynamika LH 37, 5
# Folio 125r, page id 00068534:0245
# Scan: One image of two folio pages side by side, registered by the library under both labels (also fol. 124v); this page is its right half.
# Original at the GWLB: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/resolve?id=00068534&page=245
# Source image: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/content/00068534/jpgs/default/00000245.jpg
# Model: FoNDUE-GD_v2_ft_Leibniz, run 74, 2026-09-06T16:05:13Z — 37 lines, status machine
# Lines: 37 recognised, mean confidence 0.96
# Machine transcription. Not an edition. Errors are expected: about 8% character error rate on Latin and French lines, higher on German.
# Licence: CC BY 4.0, Leibniz Legible. Machine output: do not ingest it as verified text; keep this provenance with the text.
# Wording rule: say "the machine reads it as …", never "Leibniz wrote".
# After the first blank line: the recognised lines in reading order, one per line.

de concursu Eccentrico seu nisu
uivo, multum differt inquisitio de conatu Eccentrico
 corpus GLM, cutus centrum
simul vectibus HL, et KM
tangentibus superficam corporis. ngatur Ducatur LN perpendicularis ad
contactum, utique mus est in hac LN, sed quia is non non pervenit
incentrum, quoditur quomodo ees ejus fuultas estim actio; sit esti
manda. per centrum gr. G ducatur verticaris
GR quae ipsam LN secet in F, Deinde juncta
2G. duc ducatur angulo LGE recto, rect a GE, ipsi
LN occurrens in E, quaeritur an nsus actio 
posentia in L, secundum lineam LN facta, sit ita
aestimanda, ac si esset tantum ad ipsam L, ut LG ad L5
An vero pro puncto G, adhibendo punctum F, retinebuo
perinde ac si Gisitr
totum totam actionem L
punctum G sic esset impolsum ut F quo facto
Et ita similiter si ad punctum contactus rec
MP, et jungatur MG et angulo MG G. ducatur nonvalis recta
G GZ. Quaeritur similiter, an consideranda sit actio in G, quasi
esset ad absolutam ut mG ad M9. an vero consideranda sit ut facta in S
et punctum G eodem modo afsectum seu impulsum intelligatur ut G
vel quod eodem redit si sinus redit, quaeritur an fingere liceat
quasi KM recta tangat in pluribus punctis, ut in M et T. seu quasi
raderet aliquandiu tota linea TM. Et sane si poneretur nG4
esse trannulum aequilaterum ut MG at TG essent aequales tunc peride
esset hand dubie ac si directio fuiset in G sed si aliter  res
se haberet, deberet ex hac hypothesi res eodem redire. Si vero
non approbamus hanc axpothesix nov nova et subtilis aquisitio
onetur, eo casu, qu praesertim, quo contactus sint infiniti, seu
quo vectis radi radit superficiem aliquamdi tambit.
superest et etiam haec consiteratio quod fieri potest, in
solido, ut LN non occurral ipsi rectae GR. an ergo tunc similiter pro
Jungemus quasi pranum tanens lambens perpendicalare ad LM.
b inquisitione
mortuo. at s
Gravitatis sit G. incumbat....