# Leibniz Legible — https://leibnizlegible.com
# Page: https://leibnizlegible.com/page/00068534:0361
# Permalink to this reading: https://leibnizlegible.com/page/00068534:0361?run=74
# Title: Leibniz-Handschriften zur Mechanik: Dynamika LH 37, 5
# Folio 183r, page id 00068534:0361
# Scan: One image of two folio pages side by side, registered by the library under both labels (also fol. 184v); this page is its right half.
# Original at the GWLB: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/resolve?id=00068534&page=361
# Source image: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/content/00068534/jpgs/default/00000361.jpg
# Model: FoNDUE-GD_v2_ft_Leibniz, run 74, 2026-09-06T16:05:13Z — 44 lines, status machine
# Lines: 44 recognised, mean confidence 0.91
# Machine transcription. Not an edition. Errors are expected: about 8% character error rate on Latin and French lines, higher on German.
# Licence: CC BY 4.0, Leibniz Legible. Machine output: do not ingest it as verified text; keep this provenance with the text.
# Wording rule: say "the machine reads it as …", never "Leibniz wrote".
# After the first blank line: the recognised lines in reading order, one per line.

rationibus legulu
ia dis legiblus ceanrm nitus, duae hypotheses
Cum duo corpora directe et centraliter concurrunt, derivari
posssant phaenomena ex his duobus, primum si ponamus duo
corpora concurrentia celeritatibus ad magnitudines recoprocis
redire ea vi qua venere secundo si ponamus idem evenire
adaoq
quacunque compositione motuum assumta,  seu communem
motum duobus corporibus  supponendo adjunctum
nttele eter in conquesibes u nihil mutare in motutpio
prior Hypothesis in corporibus gravibus
demonstrari potest reducendo a ad aliquod quasi absurdum
mechanicum
unis motus perpetui absurditus
spectali ex concursu.
logica necessitate non est ericta. Sed tantum duo certa sunte
omnie men seu primum ab experimento omnem tentamenta
metaphisica
motus perpetui vana reperiri.  secundo a ratione, quod
sed probabili magis quam rigorose demonstrata, quod effectus
u
plenus non debeat esse fortior causa. Equidem rigorose demon-
Sirati potest in isorrhopicis, seu staticis n posse ubi de
vi mortua agitur, non dari posse motum perpetuum. Sed
 hic de vi viva non nulla hujus modi suppesit demonstratio,
ingravibus, eventus tamen n non minus sespondet. Sed Equidem cum
duo corpora horizonti sunt paralle la gravitatis nulla, aut pene
nulla actio est, et tamen res docet observari hanc reciprocatio
nem materiae et velocilatis etano etiam in
infinite parva vi, seu solicitatione, si ab Elastro omnia de ducamus
un unde oritur idem deinde in vi biva. Sed idque in sup
satis ergo esset si in vi mortua seu solicitatione demonstrari
sane in gravitate eam
demonstrat Archimedes, ex eo quod majus plures relipitei
in esset
habet in se descendendi causas, adeoque praevalet, pro magnitudinis
p
ratione etc. sed i cum ex gravitate supposita nullum
ircum ostandit res ipsi, nam corpus ascludens impetu quodam alterius
tace apparet principium, et tamen, n ac
descendenti occurrens, descrimere conanti renilitur, perinde ac
si grade non esset. At id quidem fieri debere ostenditur
pur consequentiam, ut tvitetur motus perpetuus merhami
as si ceri causem saatem aui apparet que