# Leibniz Legible — https://leibnizlegible.com
# Page: https://leibnizlegible.com/page/00068534:0406
# Permalink to this reading: https://leibnizlegible.com/page/00068534:0406?run=74
# Title: Leibniz-Handschriften zur Mechanik: Dynamika LH 37, 5
# Folio 205v, page id 00068534:0406
# Scan: One image of two folio pages side by side, registered by the library under both labels (also fol. 206r); this page is its left half.
# Original at the GWLB: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/resolve?id=00068534&page=406
# Source image: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/content/00068534/jpgs/default/00000406.jpg
# Model: FoNDUE-GD_v2_ft_Leibniz, run 74, 2026-09-06T16:05:13Z — 67 lines, status machine
# Lines: 67 recognised, mean confidence 0.91
# Machine transcription. Not an edition. Errors are expected: about 8% character error rate on Latin and French lines, higher on German.
# Licence: CC BY 4.0, Leibniz Legible. Machine output: do not ingest it as verified text; keep this provenance with the text.
# Wording rule: say "the machine reads it as …", never "Leibniz wrote".
# After the first blank line: the recognised lines in reading order, one per line.

Galilaeus qui supponit non de propro Ticabis pondere sed de ponderbus seu potentus
applicatis simpliciter, cud virum esse, ut augentur vis, remota manm a futero,
mihi videtur errare ctibie. Et hinc cormere problema quod habeti p. 102.
invenire punctum ex quo suspensum pondus datum medeo qmam, non
quod in medio rumperet, sit sufficieris minimum ad rumpendum. Et huc
nens minui majorem esse resistentiam ad pondus appensum in loci
a medio fulcio rematioribus considerad tuli est mutata jam sentians tal
fullio medio ad pondus medium nesero quo saltius sine admonitione;
acb.
a. l
escati.L
habiturum esse vires debere superare respention primu
no c
utergus exhem pringum in ad. quasi abesset tolum cbe.
et solum esset bruchium adc fixum in ad. deinde eode
modo resipentiam be. est proinde
S. c. fit in medio priorem ad.
duplicatam, et quidem has potentius resistentiass contra has resi-
tentras calculori debet ponduse quasi ex vecte ac vel ec
etiam vincere debet resistentiam absolutam, quae
Quaestio est jam aq resistentia in Cf sit absoluta
sed denique
d’an centralis. Hoc jar dependet a longitudine  ac. vel
distent a centro, et ideo pondus in C. sit
est in cF
magnum, centralis refistentia parum angebit ejus vires, und revera
cb. si enim patuomeus
nunquam anget. an dicemus recta qui
de conari, sed effectum
enta sit craspities seu latitudo
potius grossities ut resistentia absoluta vincat centralem
esset, si in medio jor
uod et aliter per ma variavne obtineri pt. sed
esse centralem
vel
in extremis
eandem connexionem in exhemis quae est in
non minorem Hoc casu non recta perfrin-
geagtolis quam centrali conption Et potest ea fingi figura, quasi
e
sumponam 
peter
lis vinari, in fine se gnlunientos vel pliter, ut semper cogati
medio vell
pondus impositum eligere lupluram centralem. Sed nondum properen
effclendi ut pondus quocunus in loco imponatur
tabula pavimentu iteur
andum super resistential invsoiait pullo
tamen invenio modum
versa sed 
calculum obtineri posset.
prisma
non sit trabs, sed trans-
cum est aequiresistens nam si conatu
centrales, pondus appensum
et hoc trianu
sentralis.
acentro remotius non
sit centratis, nillo modo conatus
sa aequalis ad idem pondus.
Gulilaeient nec du. B. sectis intelli
poris proprio pondere sab quid calcuteri, opec
Eligere hutu locum
it esse  ejusde p resisten
le faleti
uare faleor me pondum
i be  d