# Leibniz Legible — https://leibnizlegible.com # Page: https://leibnizlegible.com/page/00068534:0409 # Permalink to this reading: https://leibnizlegible.com/page/00068534:0409?run=74 # Title: Leibniz-Handschriften zur Mechanik: Dynamika LH 37, 5 # Folio 207r, page id 00068534:0409 # Scan: One image of two folio pages side by side, registered by the library under both labels (also fol. 208v); this page is its right half. # Original at the GWLB: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/resolve?id=00068534&page=409 # Source image: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/content/00068534/jpgs/default/00000409.jpg # Model: FoNDUE-GD_v2_ft_Leibniz, run 74, 2026-09-06T16:05:13Z — 41 lines, status machine # Lines: 41 recognised, mean confidence 0.94 # Machine transcription. Not an edition. Errors are expected: about 8% character error rate on Latin and French lines, higher on German. # Licence: CC BY 4.0, Leibniz Legible. Machine output: do not ingest it as verified text; keep this provenance with the text. # Wording rule: say "the machine reads it as …", never "Leibniz wrote". # After the first blank line: the recognised lines in reading order, one per line. si totum sit firmum praeteo unum punctum extra meduo in eo fiet uatura si duo sint puncta debilia utram cis medium vel transime dium (provi verso distichentium respect., vel etiam plura, ruplura semper fiet in eo quoo dio proximum est si us aequales sint veries distrahentes et aequalis sit firmilasant debilitas fili e Sed prasdecidenda alia quaestio: si quid attrahat filum duabus partibus termiore et crassiore compositum, quaeritur qualis sit punctura tennioris cum erassiore, an sit differentia utriusque. Est tennior. deinde si dua sint firmita debilia in filo attracto loca, alter tamen altro debilior, et firmior sit remolior a trahente, nihilominus tamen superabilis, an cedat debilior, ita sane cedit, nec frimior rumpitur dum in debiliore exatus inveniri potest. Nec refert dicere, nullum esse conatum in propinquiora, cum scilicet nullum in illis lucrum. Ergo ex dirabus consistentiis aequalibus semper conatus in remotiorem, si iaequalet tunt vires distrahentes rumpiturne in recipiora ad vires distaa ita arbitur. Medium ergo intelligendum proportionis seu Geometricum. Hoc difficile demonstratu A duo trahant, implura fit viribus tantibus, quanta est si fit in medio a duabus inaequaliter trahentibus, fiet etiam in medio alar. pere nihil trahente, seu quasi penitus quoescente, condra probata. Si fit in extremo, fiet ptiam it extremo viribus pe pene penitus aequalibus. tra priora fiet ergo pro raioe extremorum. Non est. hoc demonstuandi genus quale vellem, ostensivum deducit enim tantum ad absurdum, sed nondum sodi intimiora reperio Hinc si lignum rumpitur centraliter quidem sine fulero tamen rumpetur non in medio, sed centrum, ac proinde sectio erit in diste Idem est etsi et reciproca ab extrenis virium rave. sed an idem rumpitur non sit linea recta, sed arcus circuli sit arcus Ellipseos et hyperbolae . puto nisi scilicet equa- liter distent amba a punct vertice, starum figucarum, medio habendum a. Ergo et in Hyperbota at.. d ipsi vertexa. b. a an et cd. est utrausque simulo a an semper