# Leibniz Legible — https://leibnizlegible.com # Page: https://leibnizlegible.com/page/00068575:0012 # Permalink to this reading: https://leibnizlegible.com/page/00068575:0012?run=74 # Title: Leibniz-Handschriften zur Philosophie LH 4, 3, 1d # Folio 6v, page id 00068575:0012 # Scan: The same scan is also registered as fol. 9r; its text is given once, here. # Original at the GWLB: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/resolve?id=00068575&page=12 # Source image: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/content/00068575/jpgs/default/00000012.jpg # Model: FoNDUE-GD_v2_ft_Leibniz, run 74, 2026-09-06T16:05:13Z — 140 lines, status machine # Lines: 140 recognised, mean confidence 0.77 # Machine transcription. Not an edition. Errors are expected: about 8% character error rate on Latin and French lines, higher on German. # Licence: CC BY 4.0, Leibniz Legible. Machine output: do not ingest it as verified text; keep this provenance with the text. # Wording rule: say "the machine reads it as …", never "Leibniz wrote". # After the first blank line: the recognised lines in reading order, one per line. ens HOUMB SHIIHCG ILTZ LINS CIrPUNSHIOB MIIO IIMS WISIUOLIX coiour ein cniinds cmre d sndsOd De DuoiKoVO duy SoVIXS ducuoy e cuns doscos siuorren Soncod Bonb mnes 313918 Od ur cied BrESOHOS erEISPISSE LotuI cnS eOn 5iy3Od nou c uovone1 1SO3 esdi 3VD SMBip cmiie) cump. Ponb Bupe SI odio3 cociontuy op esato ovoi porib: muosd ocgup uopo curssed SuesSO3 enceHgny y Sansds ponbotdo aniOuert 1oN eAVOX eIHISVOTOL DieSHdKOLeSGOP OMTCOPHOMIE um uou SoBMB DISSIDCIMIOM VD DOPT; CIESIOCIOSET LIEI uergus 393 cnids. unsip Bnosedro + p0nB c7 trit home ponb orumds etSOIODYT etUSnASIn(eur ipoiu Siesou erydos opyd syoyieur esy yd sensso3 sivoiecX siuoge eycososip etejgus uun onongus seuydiosip souuo 20 bonb Ouoised e ODdE snclue 1OLOHIP: DOL SLISPISSEV. OrDEOTFE YOOraSIXSEMIB eHieGTIIS SIIdIOSCBOU=OIUSIKS ejdt vo sridios iyote) cuerydosony+ uitipu) e Pono su -103 LocIOSB) HOE A) e MIISII CSNAC CIETI 3QHDESS UESIS uo oroDe nud ssso cngusio suboope uonosi aou unguo Ad B INIOL ere ex HO cos sed MEUN nO]SoITEd ExIX SoMed Seogeq D3C 3(S EIInGIISIKSLITIS ISHEPSSHEGHDEWINFUSIRS SUS 3Y SI)ISI odio op Bont sues; ScIaS DMMB; SndOS emb: duispou sc cuesip y vino; cuys siinigsodosd esovers is oypib. nomBosuos sioiod uou evris. insodosdsnutovei enb cergmp sus et(E etAD T :SBDEL HOI CEMES SIAESEMCL ∞set cmpeou oi sicice inpuerib rucur ponb cuisii X cuopbT. SHTLLH NV MITI Suy duie suverone eou seg deSi DSceoqV. Hiyod orejod mesdimpures ponb Iosoqey aeruer =GIs CIDEOHIOD CIDNOHOEI Y DIIVOL NUnISSP HOu et SnIS esse covire osdes sore sonpu sugronerp poceno scepuje in Vo som uorenoNumuo. enairs imidosse morioguodsor moses pont conrcuvaq L exipaesd onvon SNIOLL X L. VAIIXd perces omtsui os unura vovod m. drero d enbe calldstu s A ored hovesa vs. uutrorut o dibe. 1 d. lo sbles noto. lati 1SHDOZYIQ ZVINTLSAHS DE DEFLRLTIOKE i dL DIALOCUS. EOLLOCHTORES LARTESTANTCIS. PEREPATETICCS. PFTLALETHES. TIRO a ESTANOS. Accestimus ad Te, Domine, ut de ponsione, quam iniimus, sis arbiter. Dum hers Colloqueremur de rariis rebus eruditis, inter alia etiam substanciae injecta suementio, et quaectionis Lux, quid Ee substantia ? Putarit praesens Dominus, quod jocatui Pattem fueris nec terto Proniteris, le altait dore velle detinitionem, cum ipse certus sit, nullam atiam dari p vero contrarium susti pr haude detinitionem scias. Certavimus spontione. Pramium victOr auteret 6. Cantharos vini Khenani optimi, cum victo tamen ebibendi. Tu Domine, ospeseris, lclare e perspicue ostenderis, uter exnobis pro veritate certaverit. PTHI ALL THIES. Percexi vestram mentem, honoratiimi Domini. Percepi dixnam vestro charactere, veltraque Philolophia spontionem. Isholcetis rero, quodnec resero pecito, necinvitacioni Patistacere queam. V05 Bacchus decet. F80 Philolophiam agueam Corbeo. Scitis in- sper, quod inpropositione quaectionis mex promilerim, quod velim informationem aliorum expectare peranrium, ac tum de- mumcentare, utrum veram, perspicuam ex distinctam substanria desinitionem tracere possim? Accecie, quod nec aptus sim ac controversiamr vestram dirimendam. Lis ost, ut audio, an aliam defnitionem sciam ? Requihoc ipse exo nelcio. Promisi me centururum, a dare postim ? Vides Domine Cartesiane, quod qui centare vult, ip se doluisviribus dubitet. lspectate, donec aumis elapsus sic, cum ipsimet decencamine meo, et uter ve antix c CSRE SHHLUL SIAGOBLTEN Z. BIEIMSIESQ BUNGSMERONOI HtX uspmB OIF iemd ousix resiorcenbvoss sice l’eruere SILIESCOUOITCSUIOSuV CSNOC scomon solib. 10s ogeuuo (333Z 311DBOdIBGSLIIIB) ONDA PF S1SL s Valdd Cuneriuevans etducoro smurger SxHSuo3 Y CMNISI cvnur oVO SrOAn( erOPGOPCSUTIHeTOTOI eSIIOS IOP SANVISHFHVS anegn cooOB OgoqX curers SyduioxO SiresipOdcus BOj OGPAZNSUOLUMAVOLCIMSPII D surdure cuns: GDDH TyEI LIOIES eIHE 1S. Sierdi Se cII nuos oubursonsanbcnieisor sesmsiquie siuiuo i. OBLa SIDIISA HOE Iicu TonuII, 50107O9 iuojOS olereN ouomjod Sun uir SnrdO] OIL SMWITULOI OAVOU nAnSIP I 19S =+D 3O i CuverO cnF 202Od oD SOU AOIEIT enbHE OyOVI AO) aub ex SngMIOCOd; ue covonsenb pecoydaio SIITI EE SMCIVIUSAUOD SuIId IM sIY Sndo OASA E LIOTLOMIEOP SuuenB SAGOL UOPSH oP Oope in SuS HO3 SII arue SnCIBOPI WSeSqeeny Ord enb CS Umiii XD StIOTOIIIS cEPXnB esChLIOKS I S19OL V CSHIes OX odensou onemdsip seposore ocpsO AISI; I ue oryanb mieuXd; SoLHH DmB nONanbIn SOIBgNFCITON 3se NL590 08d 3 Sercad 3 segenisj40. suitopey sigon e siuoneindip XrOq 50BO] OLA ICUIS .SETIIErSGN SVS LIEPXNb ETLISCSILEK BDE LUNOgON CnD CSODHABOS SVDSLITHMASON.MIOISPHOHOSIQ -Oa in cuenb myodondueu ouon, aenb DuOnLSI ere eruii S1OAO) DuI OP coorIdns eyni: O ZT Z; CniSIOgEY SH= ipnad snni 1023O IdA SON.SigOU XO tom B Snuopood Ide IeS cOPEES HE COMEDIPNC MID LHIMAYON CII F XicEVqns Ulocor op cuereropyo sigou ex 38 sem souoranb suo ASF. Scopu ongraonsarib si sononsanb jen souon olg0 cunsorre IBDHIOPT OMIScodsegoSE LoVOA SOICHOSB EHF didp uodjos uenbunu oroxanb soduros 20 cnso3do3s. DAPIEIS oenirecue cuab ruytoncdos uouori cipus Vo VitIL. 291 soil RNOLLTALSZC 1ZCC v90 SUIBSZANFKAE DTAYOOUS. aurem exemplis, hisi prare eric, separelulis exempla perspicua ecerta a dubiis, ut eo melius postea ex detinitione exemplo rum certorum judicare possimus uerum illa dubia sint lubstantia RECHO? PERIPATETICOS. Rectemiones, Sicenim e proce dic Philolophus, dum lib. 7. Mecaph. cap. 2. antequam detinitio- nem tracat, suipponit, dari substancias. et exempla manifectis. sima ex corporibus exhibet, uc animalia, plantas ex earum par- tes, ac naturalia corpora, ut isnem, aGUaM, TErEA, CXtCrOTUM quoque singula et quxcunq; aut horium partes aut ex his sunts aue partibus aut omnibus, ut catum et ejus partes, (ydera, Lu nam et Solem. Tum subjunsit, quod quidam corporis ter- minos, ut superticiem, lineam, punctum et unitatem substan- cias esse, eemagis quam corpus et Colidum putaverint. Item alios praeter sensibilia non putasse aliguid esse substantiam, quos- dam plura et qua magis sempiterna sune, (Sicuti Plato fecerit, cu- sus oxinionem quodidex sinc substantix refitareod. J ib. 7. cap. 14. eciplas species et machematica duas substantias alseruisse, ter- tiam vero censibilium corporum substantiarm, Speusippum vero etiam plures substantias cecisse, ab uno extendisse Cubstan- rias ad principia cujus que substantia, quoruim aliud sit nume rorum, aliud magnitudinum, aliud anima. Denique quos cam fuisse qui species et numeros, non autem lineas et luperti cies, neque caeluum e sensibilia habuterine pro substantiis. loi eur necelle est, ut et nos conveniamus, quanam habeamus pro substantiis. Niror vero, quod exempla certa desideres, cum éso, enilosoptum secutus certissima dederim, nempe corpora natu- ralia. Neque creco, Doum necabis esse substantiam, quem et inter substantias Racim memorat Philosophus lib. 7. Metaph. c. 2. Revero Si Deum substantiam esse asseris, cur de Arigelo qui a quo. Spiritualis naturae est, dubitares? An vero Forto Ratuis, ango tum esse accidens? TTRO. Non tam quaerendum est, quic. nos stacuamus, quam de quo dubitencalii, qui ex ip si Ciibstantias. dasi allerum. Credo erim, quoa quaratis detiricionem sublanci